{"database": "openregs", "table": "congressional_record", "rows": [["CREC-2025-07-02-pt1-PgH3039-8", "2025-07-02", 119, 1, null, null, "PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF SENATE AMENDMENT TO H.R. 1, ONE BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL ACT", "HOUSE", "HOUSE", "ALLOTHER", "H3039", "H3059", "[{\"name\": \"Virginia Foxx\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"James P. McGovern\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Shontel M. Brown\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Jahana Hayes\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Nicholas A. Langworthy\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Austin Scott\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Joseph D. Morelle\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Addison P. McDowell\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Jamie Raskin\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Robert Garcia\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Mike Haridopolos\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Bennie G. Thompson\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Mark Alford\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Nancy Pelosi\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Maxine Waters\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Troy E. Nehls\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Debbie Wasserman Schultz\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Seth Magaziner\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Joe Wilson\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Timothy M. Kennedy\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Johnny Olszewski, Jr.\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Mike Kennedy\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Julie Johnson\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Joaquin Castro\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Michael Baumgartner\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Haley M. Stevens\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Emilia Strong Sykes\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Yvette D. Clarke\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Troy A. Carter\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Lucy McBath\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Ilhan Omar\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Dwight Evans\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Gregory W. Meeks\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Steven Horsford\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Bonnie Watson Coleman\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Joyce Beatty\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Valerie P. Foushee\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Terri A. Sewell\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Alma S. Adams\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Kweisi Mfume\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Jonathan L. Jackson\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Jasmine Crockett\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Jennifer L. McClellan\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Lateefah Simon\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Janelle S. Bynum\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Glenn Ivey\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"LaMonica McIver\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Gabe Amo\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Sydney Kamlager-Dove\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Wesley Bell\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Ritchie Torres\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Cleo Fields\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Nikema Williams\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Shomari Figures\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Danny K. Davis\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Marilyn Strickland\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Al Green\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Sanford D. Bishop, Jr.\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Summer L. Lee\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Maxwell Frost\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Robin L. Kelly\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Herbert C. Conaway, Jr.\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Andre Carson\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Sylvia R. Garcia\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Suzanne Bonamici\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Andrea Salinas\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Emily Randall\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Nikki Budzinski\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Jill N. Tokuda\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Grace Meng\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Debbie Dingell\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Chrissy Houlahan\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Lizzie Fletcher\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Paul Tonko\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Ayanna Pressley\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Laura Gillen\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Kelly Morrison\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Julia Brownley\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Norma J. Torres\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Marcy Kaptur\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Ted Lieu\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Judy Chu\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Nydia M. Velazquez\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Maxine Dexter\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Henry C. \\\"Hank\\\" Johnson, Jr.\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Greg Landsman\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Sarah Elfreth\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Sarah McBride\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Christopher R. Deluzio\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Morgan McGarvey\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Becca Balint\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Darren Soto\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Val T. Hoyle\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr.\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Donald Norcross\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Robert Menendez\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Mark Takano\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Raul Ruiz\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Kathy Castor\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Mark DeSaulnier\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Doris O. Matsui\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Chris Pappas\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Dina Titus\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Suhas Subramanyam\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Mikie Sherrill\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"John W. Mannion\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Stephen F. Lynch\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"James E. Clyburn\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Salud O. Carbajal\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Veronica Escobar\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Suzan K. DelBene\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Pramila Jayapal\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Steve Cohen\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Deborah K. Ross\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"George Whitesides\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Maggie Goodlander\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Mike Thompson\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Bradley Scott Schneider\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Greg Casar\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Greg Stanton\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Randy Fine\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Brian Babin\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Josh Riley\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Ro Khanna\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Andy Barr\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}, {\"name\": \"Joe Neguse\", \"role\": \"speaking\"}]", "[{\"congress\": \"119\", \"type\": \"HR\", \"number\": \"1\"}, {\"congress\": \"119\", \"type\": \"HR\", \"number\": \"1\"}, {\"congress\": \"119\", \"type\": \"HCONRES\", \"number\": \"14\"}, {\"congress\": \"119\", \"type\": \"HRES\", \"number\": \"566\"}, {\"congress\": \"119\", \"type\": \"HRES\", \"number\": \"566\"}, {\"congress\": \"119\", \"type\": \"HRES\", \"number\": \"566\"}]", "171 Cong. Rec. H3039", "Congressional Record, Volume 171 Issue 114 (Wednesday, July 2, 2025)\n\n[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 114 (Wednesday, July 2, 2025)]\n[House]\n[Pages H3039-H3059]\nFrom the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]\n\n  PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF SENATE AMENDMENT TO H.R. 1, ONE BIG\n                           BEAUTIFUL BILL ACT\n\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, by direction of the Committee on Rules, I call\nup House Resolution 566 and ask for its immediate consideration.\n\n[[Page H3040]]\n\n  The Clerk read the resolution, as follows:\n\n                              H. Res. 566\n\n       Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be\n     in order to take from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 1)\n     to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con.\n     Res. 14, with the Senate amendment thereto, and to consider\n     in the House, without intervention of any point of order, a\n     motion offered by the chair of the Committee on the Budget or\n     his designee that the House concur in the Senate amendment.\n     The Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as\n     read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally\n     divided among and controlled by the chair and ranking\n     minority member of the Committee on the Budget or their\n     respective designees and the chair and ranking minority\n     member of the Committee on Ways and Means or their respective\n     designees.\n\n                             point of order\n\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, pursuant to section 426(a) of the\nCongressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, I make a\npoint of order against consideration of the rule, House Resolution 566.\n  Section 426(a) of the Budget Act specifically states that the Rules\nCommittee may not waive the point of order prescribed by section 425 of\nthat same act. House Resolution 566 states that it is in order to\nconsider a motion that the House concur in the Senate amendment to H.R.\n1: ``Without intervention of any point of order.''\n  Therefore, I make a point of order pursuant to section 426(a) that\nthis rule may not be considered.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Massachusetts makes a\npoint of order that the resolution violates section 426(a) of the\nCongressional Budget Act of 1974.\n  The gentleman has met the threshold burden under the rule and the\ngentleman from Massachusetts and a Member opposed each will control 10\nminutes of debate on the question of consideration. Following debate,\nthe Chair will put the question of consideration as the statutory means\nof disposing of the point of order.\n  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Massachusetts.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.\n  Mr. Speaker, let me say this once again: We will not stand by and\nwatch Trump and his billionaire friends destroy this country without\nputting up one hell of a fight.\n  Because this rule waives the point of order against unfunded\nmandates, it is not in order to consider it on the floor.\n  The bill Republicans are attempting to jam through the House today\ncuts nutritional assistance for moms and dads, kids, people with\ndisabilities, veterans, and senior citizens. It goes after the most\nimportant people in our lives, our families, to fund massive tax breaks\nfor the richest people in the world. I think that that is wrong, and I\nthink it is immoral.\n  More than just a massive betrayal of the American people, this bill\nis also a massive, new unfunded mandate on States. Don't just take my\nword for it. The nonpartisan experts of the Congressional Budget Office\nsaid title I of the bill, the Agriculture Committee's portion of this\nawful bill, would impose intergovernmental mandates by requiring\nStates, for the first time ever, to provide State funding for food\nassistance benefits, increasing the share of food assistance\nadministrative costs paid by States and requiring State agencies to\nperform additional administrative duties. This massive, new unfunded\nmandate would cost States a whopping $19 billion each year.\n  Mr. Speaker, where the hell are States going to come up with this\nkind of money? They can't. What will happen is, people will get kicked\noff of food assistance, and they will go hungry.\n  State after State has written to Congress begging us not to pass this\nawful bill. They have made it very clear that if this bill goes\nthrough, States will be forced to cut benefits, kick eligible people\noff of food assistance entirely, or raise taxes to pay for this massive\nnew bureaucracy that Republicans are creating in every State in this\ncountry.\n  The chairman of the Agriculture Committee's home State of\nPennsylvania would have to come up with over $1 billion to cover the\nState's share of benefit costs. There is no State in this country who\nis able to take on this kind of massive, unfunded mandate.\n  We are talking about basic needs for people. It is a food assistance\nbenefit of $2 per meal so people don't go hungry. By the way, that\nmoney not only lifts people out of poverty, it improves health and it\nuplifts local economies, too.\n  Hunger costs this country, and food assistance programs save us\nmoney. People who have enough food to eat are more productive at work.\nKids who are not hungry are able to learn better at school. Seniors who\ntake their medication on a full stomach are less likely to go to\nemergency rooms.\n  No American should go without food. This is a human rights issue. We\nlive in the richest country on Earth for God's sake. Not a single kid\nin this country should go to bed hungry, not a single damn one,\nespecially not when Republicans are giving millionaires and\nbillionaires a big, fat tax break.\n  Mr. Speaker, what is wrong with my Republican colleagues? In this\nbill, they provide a $2 billion tax break for gun silencers, but they\ncut SNAP benefits for vulnerable families, which, by the way, is on\naverage $2 per person per meal. Jesus Christ, what are you people\nthinking?\n  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I claim time in favor of consideration of the\nresolution.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina is\nrecognized for 10 minutes.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, the question before the House is: Should the\nHouse now consider House Resolution 566? Though the resolution waives\nall points of order against consideration of the motion to concur in\nthe Senate amendment to H.R. 1, the Committee on Rules is not aware of\nany violation of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, nor has the\nCongressional Budget Office identified any violation of the act.\n  The reason for this motion is plain and obvious. It is not a\nlegitimate attempt to question consideration, but simply a dilatory\ntactic to further delay consideration of this historic legislation and\nto give the Democrats more time to mislead Americans.\n  We must dispense with this question of consideration so we can move\nthe process forward and enact the agenda President Trump and the\nAmerican people have demanded.\n  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, we have a letter from the Congressional\nBudget Office confirming that there are unfunded mandates in this bill.\n  Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Ohio (Ms.\nBrown).\n\n  Ms. BROWN. Mr. Speaker, I thank Ranking Member McGovern for yielding.\n  Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to this rule and the\nunderlying bill.\n  For the first time in history, this bill would force States to pay\nfor part of SNAP benefits, and it would require States to increase\ntheir share of administrative costs.\n  This is an unfunded mandate, plain and simple.\n  Let's be clear. The costs are staggering, the consequences are\ndevastating, and the cruelty is deeply disturbing.\n  This policy punishes those who can least afford it: seniors on a\nfixed income, veterans, and families already forced to choose between\ngas and groceries.\n  States will be stuck in a corner. They will cut benefits, cut\neligibility, or cut public safety, education, housing, and mental\nhealth programs just to stay afloat.\n  This isn't just a budgeting decision. It is a values decision, and\nfor what? All to take from the hungry and give it to the wealthy. To\nslash SNAP benefits just $6 per day hands a quarter-million-dollar tax\nbreak to the top 0.1 percent. That is not policy. That is plunder. The\nmath doesn't lie.\n  In North Carolina, it is $400 million. That is more than the entire\nState budget for child development and early education. In Georgia, it\nis $500 million, double what the State spends on child welfare. In my\nState of Ohio, it is $300 million, four times the transportation\nbudget.\n  My colleagues are writing checks that the government can't cash. When\nthe money runs out, the food runs out. Children will go hungry. Seniors\nwill skip meals. Veterans, working moms, and working dads will be\nturned down\n\n[[Page H3041]]\n\nand turned away all because of a vote taken here today.\n  This mandate isn't just unfunded. It is unfathomable.\n  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to reject this provision, reject\nthis rule, and reject this betrayal. Don't reward the rich on the backs\nof hungry Americans.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from\nConnecticut (Mrs. Hayes), a member of the Agriculture Committee.\n  Mrs. HAYES. Mr. Speaker, I rise today against the Republican\nreconciliation bill, which would put 42 million Americans at risk of\nlosing their SNAP benefits.\n  These policies are untested, dangerous, and arbitrary. Congress did\nnot engage in a thoughtful process to make these changes to SNAP. The\nmajority has not held a single hearing on the Nutrition, Foreign,\nAgriculture, and Horticulture Subcommittee on the cost-sharing\nprovisions or the impact of this legislation. They have not solicited\nfeedback from stakeholders or experts on what these changes would mean\nto States and hungry families who rely on SNAP.\n  The Republicans did not examine these policies closely because they\nknew it would take food away from hungry families and they didn't care.\nThey have chosen to provide tax cuts for the wealthiest individuals.\nThey know these changes will devastate State budgets.\n  In my home State of Connecticut, we could have to pay up to an\nadditional $221 million per year for SNAP benefits and an additional\n$39 million for administrative costs.\n\n                              {time}  0915\n\n  Connecticut, like most States, will have to come up with these funds\nor deny basic services that they need for other things, like education,\npublic safety, healthcare, and providing for our roads and bridges in\nour States. Notably, not every State will be subject to this change.\n  Late into the night, the Republican majority jumped through hoops to\nexempt noncontiguous States from these policies to pass cruel\nlegislation. That is why we are up here writing legislation on the fly\nto protect some Americans while going after others.\n  No one should go hungry, whether they live in Connecticut, Alaska,\nHawaii, or anywhere. It should not matter where you live or what kind\nof deal your Senator made. Everybody deserves to eat.\n  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to reject this irresponsible\nlegislation.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, may I inquire as to how much time is\nremaining.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Massachusetts has 2\\1/4\\\nminutes remaining.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.\n  Mr. Speaker, I don't think any of my Republican colleagues have read\nthis provision in the reconciliation bill. In fact, the Agriculture\nCommittee never even did a hearing on it. Yet, billions and billions of\ndollars in new costs are going to be thrust upon States. States are\ngoing to have to decide whether to cut other programs in order to make\nsure that no one loses their nutrition benefits, or they are going to\nhave to cut people off their nutrition benefits.\n  The SNAP benefit, on average, is about $2 per person per meal. That\nis it. You can't buy a damn cup of coffee in the Capitol with that. My\nRepublican friends are obsessed with trying to throw people off of this\nbenefit. I have no idea why.\n  Most of the people on the benefit are children and senior citizens.\nThey include veterans. Many of them are working full time and can't\nafford to put food on the table. This benefit helps them provide for\ntheir families.\n  My Republican friends have basically gone on an attack on this most\nbasic, effective program that is about food. You can live without a lot\nof things, but you can't live without food.\n  Mr. Speaker, for those Republicans who think it is okay to give Jeff\nBezos a tax cut and, at the same time, cut food benefits for struggling\nfamilies, let me say clearly that we don't share the same values.\n  Unloading billions of dollars in new costs on States, money they do\nnot have, will force them to cut benefits and throw needy people off of\nSNAP. It is a rotten thing to do.\n  I believe there is a special place in hell for people who take food\naway from veterans, seniors, children, former foster youth, and hungry\nfamilies. This is sick. This is disgusting.\n  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I urge all Members to vote ``yes'' on the\nquestion of consideration of the resolution, and I yield back the\nbalance of my time.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. All time for debate has expired.\n  The question is, Will the House now consider the resolution?\n  The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that\nthe ayes appeared to have it.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.\n  The yeas and nays were ordered.\n  The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 212,\nnays 211, not voting 9, as follows:\n\n                             [Roll No. 186]\n\n                               YEAS--212\n\n     Aderholt\n     Alford\n     Allen\n     Amodei (NV)\n     Arrington\n     Babin\n     Bacon\n     Baird\n     Balderson\n     Barr\n     Barrett\n     Baumgartner\n     Bean (FL)\n     Begich\n     Bentz\n     Bergman\n     Bice\n     Biggs (AZ)\n     Biggs (SC)\n     Bilirakis\n     Boebert\n     Bost\n     Brecheen\n     Bresnahan\n     Buchanan\n     Burchett\n     Calvert\n     Cammack\n     Carey\n     Carter (GA)\n     Carter (TX)\n     Ciscomani\n     Cline\n     Cloud\n     Clyde\n     Cole\n     Collins\n     Comer\n     Crane\n     Crank\n     Crawford\n     Crenshaw\n     Davidson\n     De La Cruz\n     DesJarlais\n     Diaz-Balart\n     Donalds\n     Downing\n     Edwards\n     Ellzey\n     Emmer\n     Estes\n     Evans (CO)\n     Ezell\n     Fallon\n     Fedorchak\n     Feenstra\n     Fine\n     Finstad\n     Fischbach\n     Fitzpatrick\n     Fleischmann\n     Flood\n     Fong\n     Foxx\n     Franklin, Scott\n     Fry\n     Fulcher\n     Gill (TX)\n     Gimenez\n     Goldman (TX)\n     Gonzales, Tony\n     Gooden\n     Gosar\n     Graves\n     Green (TN)\n     Greene (GA)\n     Griffith\n     Grothman\n     Guest\n     Guthrie\n     Hageman\n     Hamadeh (AZ)\n     Haridopolos\n     Harrigan\n     Harris (MD)\n     Harris (NC)\n     Harshbarger\n     Higgins (LA)\n     Hill (AR)\n     Hinson\n     Houchin\n     Hudson\n     Huizenga\n     Hunt\n     Hurd (CO)\n     Issa\n     Jack\n     Jackson (TX)\n     James\n     Johnson (LA)\n     Johnson (SD)\n     Jordan\n     Joyce (OH)\n     Joyce (PA)\n     Kean\n     Kelly (MS)\n     Kelly (PA)\n     Kennedy (UT)\n     Kiggans (VA)\n     Kiley (CA)\n     Kim\n     Knott\n     Kustoff\n     LaHood\n     LaLota\n     LaMalfa\n     Langworthy\n     Latta\n     Lawler\n     Lee (FL)\n     Letlow\n     Loudermilk\n     Lucas\n     Luna\n     Luttrell\n     Mace\n     Mackenzie\n     Malliotakis\n     Maloy\n     Mann\n     Massie\n     Mast\n     McCaul\n     McClain\n     McClintock\n     McCormick\n     McDowell\n     McGuire\n     Messmer\n     Miller (IL)\n     Miller (WV)\n     Miller-Meeks\n     Mills\n     Moolenaar\n     Moore (AL)\n     Moore (NC)\n     Moore (UT)\n     Moore (WV)\n     Moran\n     Murphy\n     Nehls\n     Newhouse\n     Norman\n     Nunn (IA)\n     Obernolte\n     Ogles\n     Onder\n     Owens\n     Palmer\n     Patronis\n     Perry\n     Pfluger\n     Reschenthaler\n     Rogers (AL)\n     Rogers (KY)\n     Rose\n     Rouzer\n     Roy\n     Rulli\n     Rutherford\n     Salazar\n     Scalise\n     Schmidt\n     Schweikert\n     Scott, Austin\n     Self\n     Sessions\n     Shreve\n     Simpson\n     Smith (MO)\n     Smith (NE)\n     Smith (NJ)\n     Smucker\n     Spartz\n     Stauber\n     Stefanik\n     Steil\n     Steube\n     Strong\n     Stutzman\n     Taylor\n     Tenney\n     Thompson (PA)\n     Tiffany\n     Timmons\n     Turner (OH)\n     Valadao\n     Van Duyne\n     Van Orden\n     Wagner\n     Walberg\n     Weber (TX)\n     Webster (FL)\n     Westerman\n     Wied\n     Williams (TX)\n     Wilson (SC)\n     Wittman\n     Womack\n     Yakym\n     Zinke\n\n                               NAYS--211\n\n     Adams\n     Aguilar\n     Amo\n     Ansari\n     Auchincloss\n     Balint\n     Barragan\n     Beatty\n     Bell\n     Bera\n     Beyer\n     Bishop\n     Bonamici\n     Boyle (PA)\n     Brown\n     Brownley\n     Budzinski\n     Bynum\n     Carbajal\n     Carson\n     Carter (LA)\n     Casar\n     Case\n     Casten\n     Castor (FL)\n     Castro (TX)\n     Cherfilus-McCormick\n     Chu\n     Cisneros\n     Clark (MA)\n     Clarke (NY)\n     Cleaver\n     Clyburn\n     Cohen\n     Conaway\n     Correa\n     Costa\n     Courtney\n     Craig\n     Crockett\n     Crow\n     Cuellar\n     Davids (KS)\n     Davis (IL)\n     Davis (NC)\n     Dean (PA)\n     DeGette\n     DeLauro\n     DelBene\n     Deluzio\n     DeSaulnier\n     Dexter\n     Dingell\n     Doggett\n     Elfreth\n     Escobar\n     Espaillat\n     Evans (PA)\n     Fields\n     Figures\n     Fletcher\n     Foster\n     Foushee\n     Frankel, Lois\n     Friedman\n     Frost\n     Garamendi\n     Garcia (CA)\n     Garcia (IL)\n     Garcia (TX)\n     Gillen\n     Golden (ME)\n     Goldman (NY)\n     Gomez\n     Gonzalez, V.\n     Goodlander\n     Gottheimer\n     Gray\n     Green, Al (TX)\n     Harder (CA)\n     Hayes\n     Himes\n     Horsford\n     Houlahan\n     Hoyer\n     Hoyle (OR)\n     Huffman\n     Ivey\n     Jackson (IL)\n     Jacobs\n     Jayapal\n     Jeffries\n     Johnson (GA)\n     Johnson (TX)\n     Kamlager-Dove\n     Kaptur\n     Keating\n     Kelly (IL)\n     Kennedy (NY)\n     Khanna\n     Krishnamoorthi\n     Landsman\n     Larsen (WA)\n     Larson (CT)\n     Lee (NV)\n     Lee (PA)\n     Leger Fernandez\n\n[[Page H3042]]\n\n     Levin\n     Liccardo\n     Lieu\n     Lofgren\n     Lynch\n     Magaziner\n     Mannion\n     Matsui\n     McBath\n     McBride\n     McClain Delaney\n     McClellan\n     McCollum\n     McDonald Rivet\n     McGarvey\n     McGovern\n     McIver\n     Meeks\n     Menendez\n     Meng\n     Mfume\n     Min\n     Moore (WI)\n     Morelle\n     Morrison\n     Moskowitz\n     Moulton\n     Mrvan\n     Mullin\n     Nadler\n     Neal\n     Neguse\n     Norcross\n     Ocasio-Cortez\n     Olszewski\n     Omar\n     Pallone\n     Panetta\n     Pappas\n     Pelosi\n     Perez\n     Peters\n     Pettersen\n     Pingree\n     Pocan\n     Pou\n     Pressley\n     Quigley\n     Ramirez\n     Randall\n     Raskin\n     Riley (NY)\n     Rivas\n     Ross\n     Ruiz\n     Ryan\n     Salinas\n     Sanchez\n     Scanlon\n     Schakowsky\n     Schneider\n     Scholten\n     Schrier\n     Scott (VA)\n     Scott, David\n     Sewell\n     Sherman\n     Sherrill\n     Simon\n     Smith (WA)\n     Sorensen\n     Soto\n     Stansbury\n     Stanton\n     Stevens\n     Strickland\n     Subramanyam\n     Suozzi\n     Swalwell\n     Sykes\n     Takano\n     Thanedar\n     Thompson (CA)\n     Thompson (MS)\n     Titus\n     Tlaib\n     Tokuda\n     Tonko\n     Torres (CA)\n     Torres (NY)\n     Trahan\n     Tran\n     Underwood\n     Vargas\n     Vasquez\n     Veasey\n     Velazquez\n     Vindman\n     Wasserman Schultz\n     Waters\n     Watson Coleman\n     Whitesides\n     Williams (GA)\n     Wilson (FL)\n\n                             NOT VOTING--9\n\n     Burlison\n     Dunn (FL)\n     Fitzgerald\n     Garbarino\n     Hern (OK)\n     Latimer\n     Meuser\n     Miller (OH)\n     Van Drew\n\n                              {time}  1057\n\n  Messrs. GARCIA of California, GARCIA of Illinois, Mrs. McCLAIN\nDELANEY, Messrs. CROW and SMITH of Washington changed their vote from\n``yea'' to ``nay.''\n  Messrs. JACKSON of Texas and HARRIS of Maryland changed their vote\nfrom ``nay'' to ``yea.''\n  So the question of consideration was decided in the affirmative.\n  The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.\n  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina is\nrecognized for 1 hour.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, for the purpose of debate only, I yield the\ncustomary 30 minutes to the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr.\nMcGovern), pending which I yield myself such time as I may consume.\n  Mr. Speaker, during consideration of this resolution, all time\nyielded is for the purpose of debate only.\n\n                             General Leave\n\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may\nhave 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the\ngentlewoman from North Carolina?\n  There was no objection.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, Republicans stand ready to deliver H.R. 1\ndirectly to the President's desk for his signature.\n  Late last year, the American people rallied en masse behind the\nRepublican vision for a renewed Nation. It is a nation no longer\nblighted by the cataclysmic failures of the previous administration,\nand a nation primed and ready to enter the golden age.\n  One of the many strong reinforced byproducts of our Republican vision\nis the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. It is one of the most consequential\npieces of legislation that any party has ever passed and for good\nreason.\n  The provisions interwoven in this legislation are monumental. They\nare what the American people voted for in November: historic tax relief\nfor working families; massive investments to secure our Nation's\nborders; capturing generational savings; and slashing waste, fraud, and\nabuse in government programs so that they may run more efficiently for\nthose who truly need them.\n\n                              {time}  1100\n\n  Mr. Speaker, I could opine at length about the wins that Republicans\nhave secured in this bill, wins that we have been highlighting to the\nAmerican people for months. Meanwhile, our Democratic colleagues have\nresorted to fear-mongering and wailing from their bully pulpits in the\nhopes of deceiving the American people.\n  For months, we have heard Democrats claim that the sky was falling,\nthat all hope is lost because H.R. 1 will bring about the end times,\nand a litany of other outlandish and absurd claims. They are so\ndesperate to smear H.R. 1 and deny the American people the policies\nthat the American people overwhelmingly voted for in November.\n  Let's again focus on what this bill accomplishes. It yields the\nsingle greatest cut in wasteful government spending in congressional\nhistory by slashing far more than a trillion dollars of bloat. It\npreserves the greatest battle-tested set of tax cuts for working\nfamilies that our Nation has ever seen or our economy has ever\nrealized. It doubles down on the border priorities of the most\nsuccessful enforcement efforts by a President in our Nation's history.\nIt realigns our economy in defense of American workers, American\nenergy, American businesses, and American job creators to unleash the\nengines of our economy, raise the tide of our economic standards, and\nbring a new definition of American greatness to the world.\n  Perhaps the reason why Democrats are so desperate to smear this\nlegislation is because they are caught in their own self-inflicted\nmalaise of denial. Perhaps they still can't accept that Americans chose\nRepublicans to lead the Nation instead of them.\n  That said, Mr. Speaker, Republicans are not distracted by that fear-\nmongering and doomsaying of those who want H.R. 1 to fail. The facts\nare on our side, and we have been cutting through the noise by bringing\nthose facts to the American people for months.\n  So that the record is clear, a vote against this legislation is a\nvote to green-light the largest tax increase in American history being\nlevied against everyday men and women, to decimate millions of jobs\nacross America, and to kneecap the capabilities and readiness of the\nNation's military. This is not fear-mongering like what our colleagues\nacross the aisle have been engaging in. These are just facts.\n  Mr. Speaker, the pathway forward is crystal clear. The House must\npass this rule and pass the Senate amendment to H.R. 1 so that more\nwins can be delivered to the American people. The American people\ndeserve to keep winning, and to deny them that opportunity is a\nflagrant disservice.\n  This legislation is the embodiment of the America First agenda, and\nwe would all do well to remember that. Failure at this critical\njuncture is not an option. This clock is ticking. The President and the\nAmerican people are waiting.\n  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentlewoman from North\nCarolina for yielding me the customary 30 minutes, and I yield myself\nsuch time as I may consume.\n  Mr. Speaker, this process is an abomination, legislative malpractice.\nFinal text of this bill came out less than 24 hours ago. We met in\ncommittee an hour after it was posted, and now, we are here considering\na rule that allows for only 1 hour of debate.\n  This bill is within the jurisdiction of 12 different committees. One\nhour is ridiculous. Every minute, we are finding out new things that\nwere snuck into the bill, like a tax cut for whalers. Now, we are\nlearning about a gambling tax.\n  Republican leadership and the White House are jamming this bill down\nour throats. For what? We are not on a deadline. There is no looming\ncrisis.\n  We are here because Donald Trump wants a Fourth of July party to\ncelebrate this garbage bill. He wants fireworks, flags, and cameras,\nnot for this country, but for himself. He says to close your ears,\nclose your eyes, and vote for this bill. Honestly, it sounds more like\na cult than a Congress to me.\n  Some Republicans promised their voters no cuts to Medicaid and no new\ndebt. Now, they are flipping faster than pancakes at a campaign\nbreakfast. The House passed it hoping the Senate would kill it. The\nSenate passed it hoping the House would grow a spine.\n  Everyone is playing a game of legislative chicken, voting for a bad\nbill and thinking the other Chamber will be the one to fix it. This is\nnuts.\n  Trump says: ``Have fun, and Vote `YAY.' '' Have fun gutting Medicaid?\nVote ``yea'' on taking away food from poor families? Are you serious?\n  This bill is catastrophic. It is not policy. It is punishment.\n  Let's talk facts. It slashes Medicaid, cuts Medicare, and dismantles\nthe ACA. It shutters rural hospitals, closes nursing homes, and wipes\nout health centers. It takes food off kitchen tables, throws clean\nenergy workers out of jobs, and spikes utility bills. Why? So\nbillionaires and oil companies can\n\n[[Page H3043]]\n\ncash in. Big Oil gets handouts. Billionaires get tax breaks. Working\nfamilies get scraps, if that.\n  Jeff Bezos just had a $50 million wedding in Venice, and they want to\ngive him another tax break. Meanwhile, families making under $50,000 a\nyear get less than a buck a day in tax cuts. You can't even buy a cup\nof coffee with that.\n  The cost? Over $3 trillion added to the debt and a $5 trillion debt\nceiling raise brought to you by the very people who won't shut up about\nso-called fiscal responsibility.\n  This isn't tax reform to relieve the middle and working class. It is\na robbery that will result in the largest transfer of wealth from the\npoor to the rich our country has ever seen.\n  Let's not lie to the American people. This is about taking from the\nmost vulnerable to pay off the already powerful. It is about pleasing\none man who is holding this Congress hostage with primary threats and\nsocial media tantrums.\n  This bill is cruel. It is cowardly. It is a betrayal of everything\nthis country is supposed to stand for.\n\n  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from New\nYork (Mr. Langworthy).\n  Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of the\nrule to consider H.R. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.\n  The stakes for the American people could not be higher. We are\nrapidly approaching a fiscal cliff. If we do nothing, the Trump tax\ncuts, the most progrowth tax reforms in generations, will expire.\n  That means higher taxes on nearly every American. That means a gutted\nchild tax credit. That means small businesses will lose the tools they\nneed to survive and to thrive. That means less take-home pay for\nworking families that have already been crushed by the Biden-era\ninflation.\n  This isn't some hypothetical scenario. This is the Democrats' game\nplan. They want to raise taxes. They want to punish success. They want\nmore people dependent on government and fewer people building\nindependent lives. Republicans will not let that happen.\n  With H.R. 1, we are stepping in to lock in the Trump tax cuts\npermanently and to provide targeted new relief to the workers and the\nfamilies who keep this country running: seniors, tipped workers, and\nthose putting in overtime to get ahead.\n  Mr. Speaker, this bill also takes a critical step to protect and\nstrengthen Medicaid, a vital program for millions of Americans.\n  Let me be very clear about something: This isn't anything radical. We\nare restoring the same commonsense work requirements that President\nBill Clinton signed into law in the 1990s, one of the most popular\nthings he did.\n  Back then, a Democratic President worked with a Republican Congress\nto say that if you are able-bodied and adult without dependents and\nreceiving government assistance, you should be expected to work, train,\nor volunteer and participate in the economy. It worked. Poverty\ndropped, employment rose, and millions of Americans moved from welfare\nto work and independence.\n  Democrats today have abandoned that model. They want permanent\ngovernment dependency. They will oppose any form of accountability, and\nthey will vilify anyone who dares to suggest that opportunity should\ncome with responsibility. Republicans are standing up for what works\nand what is right.\n\n                              {time}  1110\n\n  We are saying Medicaid must remain a lifeline for the truly\nvulnerable: children, seniors, people with disabilities, and low-income\nparents.\n  However, for able-bodied adults without kids, yes, you should try to\nwork, just like in the 1990s, just like under President Bill Clinton.\n  This isn't extreme. It is not partisan. It is proven policy that\nrespects both taxpayers and lifts people up.\n  Mr. Speaker, this bill delivers economic relief, fiscal sanity, and\nbasic fairness. It secures the future of our economy and our safety\nnet.\n  Let's choose the path that has been tested and proven to work. Let's\napprove this rule. Let's pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, and let's\nget this country back on track.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.\n  I want to alert all Members to something about this rule. It has a\nmistake in it.\n  Republicans have rushed this process from the very beginning to meet\nTrump's artificial July 4 deadline, and this rule is no exception.\n  We found an error in the rule at 2 a.m. after the Rules Committee\nreported the rule. This is going to sound a little in the weeds, but\nthey forgot to do something called considering the previous question as\nordered on their big ugly bill.\n  Now, let me put that in English. What that means is they won't have\nan escape hatch once they start debate on this bill. If they start it\nand they realize they don't have the votes, they still have to take the\nembarrassing vote. There are also other consequences, but this\nSpeaker's timeout authority is the one Republican leadership is most\nafraid of.\n  Now, I expect they will try to fix this with an amendment, but I have\na question for Members. If this Republican leadership cannot get a one-\nparagraph rule right, can we really trust them to get an 870-page bill\nright?\n  Not only are we going to find things that were sneaked into this\nbill, we are going to find massive mistakes that have unintended\nconsequences for people and industries across this country.\n  This whole process has been lousy, and this rule is no exception.\n  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from\nGeorgia (Mr. Austin Scott).\n  Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the\nopportunity to address the American citizens for just a couple of\nminutes.\n  I know many of our citizens are concerned about some of the language\nin the bill, and I think maybe the reason they are concerned is because\nthe people that are telling them what is in the bill never bothered to\nread the bill, so I thought I would just read to them a part.\n  If the Democrats have read this, then they are lying to the general\npublic.\n  This excerpt is on SNAP. ``Exceptions. Paragraph (2) shall not apply\nto an individual if the individual is-- (A) under 18, or over 65, years\nof age;\n  (B) medically certified as physically or mentally unfit for\nemployment;\n  (C) a parent or other member of a household with responsibility for a\ndependent child under 14 years of age . . .''\n  When the Democrats are telling you that we are kicking disabled\npeople off of SNAP or we are kicking disabled people off of Medicaid,\nit is an absolute lie.\n  Look at pages 16 and 17 of the legislation. It will take about 60\nseconds to read it. That is exactly what it says.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, there is a lot of low energy on that side.\n  I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Morelle), the\ndistinguished ranking member of the Committee on House Administration.\n  Mr. MORELLE. Mr. Speaker, I thank my good friend, the gentleman from\nMassachusetts, the ranking member of the Rules Committee, for yielding.\n  Mr. Speaker, as we reach the apparent conclusion of this absurd\nexercise, it is worth asking: What is the purpose of this bill? This\nbill will strip away health insurance from nearly 17 million people,\ndevastating communities like mine in Rochester, New York. This bill\nwill recklessly eliminate food assistance for nearly 3 million\nAmericans, including nearly a million senior citizens. This bill will\nexplode the deficit by $3.3 trillion.\n  For what?\n  Well, Mr. Speaker, sometimes the simplest explanation is closest to\nthe truth. We all saw the gaggle of billionaires sitting behind Donald\nTrump on Inauguration Day earlier this year. The driving force behind\nthis entire legislative effort has been to grant handouts to those same\nbillionaires and special interests all at the expense of hardworking\nfamilies.\n  Mr. Speaker, I hope my colleagues on the other side of the aisle will\nstop and think again before voting for the worst piece of legislation\nin generations. But I know one thing for certain, House Democrats will\nnever stop fighting for American families.\n\n[[Page H3044]]\n\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the distinguished\ngentleman from North Carolina (Mr. McDowell).\n  Mr. McDOWELL. Mr. Speaker, today we take another big step toward\ndelivering a course correction for our country. The American people\nsent us here with a mandate, to fight back and deliver on a promise.\nThat is what the One Big Beautiful Bill Act does.\n  Americans should first know what my colleagues in opposition to this\nlegislation are voting for and what they are voting against.\n  Not passing this bill means a $1,700 increase in taxes for the\naverage American family of four. Mr. Speaker, that might not be a big\ndeal to the elites in Manhattan or San Francisco, but it does mean a\nlot to the people of my district in North Carolina.\n\n  Not passing this bill means our Border Patrol officers and our Coast\nGuard won't have what they need to secure the border and stop the flow\nof deadly fentanyl.\n  It doesn't stop there, Mr. Speaker. Opposing this bill also means\nprotecting waste over purpose, fraud over fairness, and foreign\ninterests over American strength.\n  Mr. Speaker, I want to make sure voters in my district know what\npassing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will mean for them. It means\nthey get to keep more of their hard-earned money. It means that small\nbusinesses can spend more money on their employees instead of sending\nit to Washington. This bill will make our communities safer by making a\nhistoric investment in our border security. No more dangerous, illegal\naliens parading around with no consequences.\n  Mr. Speaker, this legislation is one of the most consequential items\nwe will vote on. It is President Trump's agenda, and it is what we all\ntold the people back home we would do.\n  Now the House must get it done. I urge all of my colleagues to vote\nin favor of this rule. Let's choose our country over comfort and get\nthe One Big Beautiful Bill Act to the President's desk.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I know a Senator from North Carolina who\ndisagrees with everything the gentleman just said, including a lot of\nhospitals in North Carolina that disagree with what he just said.\n  Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Maryland (Mr.\nRaskin), the distinguished ranking member of the Committee on the\nJudiciary.\n  Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Speaker, I found the preamble to this big ugly bill:\nWe, the billionaires and our king, in order to deform and sicken our\nUnion, establish injustice, ensure domestic servility, weaken our\npeople's defenses, undermine the general welfare, and reserve to\nourselves and our posterity staggering debt servitude for eternity, do\nhereby instruct the Republicans in Congress to strip 17 million people\nof their healthcare, increase copays, deductibles, and premiums for\neveryone else, cut 42 million people off of nutritional assistance,\nincrease the national debt by $4 trillion, trash renewable energy\nsystems, increase our electric bills for the carbon kings, all to\nweaken and destroy the Constitution of the people of these United\nStates of America.\n  Please include this preamble in the legislative Record.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from\nCalifornia (Mr. Garcia), the distinguished ranking member of the\nCommittee on Oversight and Government Reform.\n  Mr. GARCIA of California. Mr. Speaker, my Democratic colleagues and I\nbelieve in a country where we take care of our fellow Americans and the\nwealthiest pay their fair share. However, Republicans are fighting for\nthe biggest rip-off in American history and the biggest attack on our\nsocial safety net in decades.\n  If this bill passes, 16 million people are going to lose their health\ninsurance. They will take away basic food assistance from millions of\nveterans, seniors, and kids. The poorest 10 percent of Americans are\ngoing to lose $1,600 per person on average while the richest only get\nricher because of this bill. It is a transfer from the poor and the\nmiddle class to the wealthiest. It does all of this while increasing\ndebt over $3 trillion.\n  What happened to fiscal responsibility?\n  That means that our grandkids will fund a tax cut for Elon Musk. Now,\nwhile I am proud that we are defeating a number of extremely concerning\nprovisions in this House bill, this is our last chance to stand up for\nour values.\n  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to vote ``no'' on this big BS bill.\nThe American people are watching.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from\nFlorida (Mr. Haridopolos).\n  Mr. HARIDOPOLOS. Mr. Speaker, promises made, promises kept.\n  Voters wanted change for one simple reason: It was too expensive to\nlive in America for the last 4 years. Gas prices, rent prices, and food\nprices were up radically. This bill is designed to help those very\npeople hurt over the last 4 years. People who earn tips or overtime, as\nwell as those who earn Social Security get a big tax cut.\n\n                              {time}  1120\n\n  Mr. Speaker, let's be clear, so the American public hears it loud and\nclear: The current tax rate on the wealthiest Americans is 37 percent.\nUnder this bill, it remains at 37 percent.\n  At the same time, we are protecting the most vulnerable. Please read\nthe bill. Seniors in nursing homes are unaffected. Persons who are\ndisabled are unaffected. Pregnant women on Medicaid are unaffected.\nLow-income kids, whose parents aren't making much, are unaffected.\n  Isn't it nice to see that Washington actually keeps its promises from\nthe campaign trail? This is a welcome change. Donald Trump said that we\nare going to bring America back by putting more money back in their\npockets, instead of sending it up here to Washington, D.C.\n  He promised a secure border. Mr. Speaker, there is a 99 percent\nreduction in the number of people coming across the border illegally.\nThat is action. What are we putting in this bill? We are putting in the\nmoney needed to make sure it stays that way.\n  I am proud to support this bill because I came to Washington for one\nreason: I came to Washington to make promises, keep promises, and prove\nthat the Republicans can lead and are willing to make sure that the\ngreat American comeback continues.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I read the bill, too. I want to know why\nJeff Bezos and multimillionaires and multibillionaires are getting tax\ncuts.\n  Last night, I offered an amendment to let Trump's tax cuts expire\nonly for people earning more than $1 billion a year. Every single\nRepublican voted against it. What is that all about? Follow the money.\n  Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Mississippi (Mr.\nThompson), the distinguished ranking member of the Committee on\nHomeland Security.\n  Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from\nMassachusetts (Mr. McGovern) for yielding time.\n  Mr. Speaker, Republicans are openly bragging about how the bill kicks\nchildren and the elderly off Medicaid, nutritional assistance, and\nmore, all to pay for another tax break for wealthy Republican donors.\n  My Republican colleagues are not talking about the trillions and\ntrillions of dollars their political giveaway is going to cost. In\nfact, Mr. Speaker, Vice President Vance has said historic levels of\nHomeland Security funding in the bill sweetens the deal for the devil.\n  This deal means billions of American tax dollars to build a wall\nTrump promised Mexico would pay for.\n  This bill means billions of dollars for masked ICE agents to\nterrorize immigrant families who have been contributing to our country\nfor decades, including law-abiding marines and even American kids.\n  This bill means billions of dollars for DHS to continue obstructing\nCongress and denying due process to legal immigrants.\n  My Republican colleagues may be fooled by the one big, ugly bill, but\nthe American people are not. I urge my colleagues to vote ``no'' on the\nrule and the underlying bill.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2\\1/2\\ minutes to the gentleman from\nMissouri (Mr. Alford).\n\n[[Page H3045]]\n\n  Mr. ALFORD. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentlewoman from Virginia (Ms.\nFoxx) for her work on this.\n  Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of the rule and in strong\nsupport of H.R. 1, President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act.\n  Today, Mr. Speaker, we face a watershed moment for the American\npeople. This Republican majority was given a clear mandate by the\nAmerican people, which is the America First agenda. This bill is our\nopportunity to deliver on that agenda.\n  H.R. 1 stops the largest tax increase in U.S. history, while\nproviding the largest tax cut for working-and middle-class families\never, with no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, and tax breaks for\nseniors.\n  H.R. 1 protects the 87,000 Missouri farms and countless family-owned\nsmall businesses from double taxation by expanding the death tax\nexemption.\n  The One Big Beautiful Bill Act reverses 4 long years of Biden's open-\nborder policies with a generational investment in border security,\nincluding funding to complete phase 2 of the border wall.\n  The One Big Beautiful Bill Act modernizes our Armed Forces for 21st\ncentury threats by properly funding our military and funding the Golden\nDome.\n  H.R. 1 ends the progressive left's war on American energy by\nunleashing domestic oil, natural gas, and nuclear energy production.\nH.R. 1 lowers energy costs, ensuring reliable and stable energy\nsources. H.R. 1 renews not just energy independence but makes us energy\ndominant once again.\n  Finally, H.R. 1 restores fiscal sanity by cutting almost $2 trillion\nin Federal spending. It rescinds billions in green new scam funding. It\neliminates waste, fraud, and abuse from numerous Federal programs.\n  Mr. Speaker, this is a time for choosing. We can choose to side with\nthe illegal aliens, unelected rogue bureaucrats, and fear-mongering\nfrom the America left or we can choose to side with the American people\nand deliver on the mandate that they gave us back in November.\n  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to put America first, support the\nrule, and pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, cult much? That gentleman's poster says it\nall. It is not about American families. It is about one big party for\nTrump. It is about swelling up his ego.\n  Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from California (Ms.\nPelosi), the Speaker Emerita.\n  Ms. PELOSI. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Massachusetts\n(Mr. McGovern) for his leadership.\n  Mr. Speaker, the gentleman just ended by asking us to vote for the\nOne Big Beautiful Bill Act. If beauty is in the eye of the beholder,\nthe GOP has a very blurred vision of what America is about.\n  Is it beautiful to cut off food from seniors and children? Is it\nbeautiful to cut off 17 million people from healthcare? Is it beautiful\nto do this to give tax cuts to billionaires in our country? Is it\nbeautiful to take money from education and the rest? The list goes on\nand on.\n\n  Nearly 60 years ago, Dr. King said: ``Of all the forms of inequality,\ninjustice in health is the most shocking and the most inhuman because\nit often results in physical death.''\n  We come to this floor with the moral force of Dr. King's words in our\nhearts. Let us not with this bill turn the American Dream he talked\nabout into a nightmare for America's seniors, the disabled, and our\nchildren. Let us vote ``no'' on this shameful bill and throw a punch\nfor the children.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from\nCalifornia (Ms. Waters), the distinguished ranking member of the\nCommittee on Financial Services.\n  Ms. WATERS. Mr. Speaker, this big, ugly bill strikes healthcare from\n17 million Americans, shutters hospitals, and starves 12 million people\nby taking away their food stamps.\n  These cuts add up to $1.3 trillion, the exact cost of the tax cut\nRepublicans are handing out to the richest 1 percent of Americans. That\nis not all. The entire bill will add a whopping $3.3 trillion to our\nNation's $35 trillion debt. So much for Republicans being the party of\nfiscal responsibility.\n  They are also gutting the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an\nagency that returned $21 billion to families cheated by megabanks. They\nare cutting housing funds during an affordability crisis and weakening\noversight of Wall Street. Maybe they have forgotten that the people\nelected them, not Trump or the billionaire class.\n  Mr. Speaker, it will be a cold day in hell before we let Republicans\nget away with this.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, if I could inquire of the gentlewoman, if\nshe doesn't have many speakers, maybe she can lend us some time. We\nhave a ton.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I would say nice try to the gentleman from\nMassachusetts (Mr. McGovern).\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I say that because here in Congress, we\nmeasure how much people really believe in their position by whether\nthey are willing to come and join their leaders on the House floor.\n  I count 4 Members on the Republican side, and we have over 75 here.\nIf I were them, I wouldn't want to be associated with this bill either.\n  Mr. Speaker, I urge we defeat the previous question. If we do, I will\noffer an amendment to the rule to consider amendment No. 156 offered by\nLeader Jeffries, which strikes all provisions that will cause millions\nof Americans to lose healthcare and food assistance.\n  Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to insert the text of my\namendment into the Record, along with any extraneous material,\nimmediately prior to the vote on the previous question.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the\ngentleman from Massachusetts?\n  There was no objection.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from\nNew York (Ms. Ocasio Cortez) to discuss our proposal.\n\n                              {time}  1130\n\n  Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ. Mr. Speaker, President Trump issued some\nstatements throughout this process saying, urging, and insisting that\nthis bill does not cut Medicaid.\n  He has also said some things. He says he doesn't think I am too much\nof a smart person. I will tell you one thing. It doesn't take a smart\nperson to know if you are being lied to.\n  President Trump, you are either being lied to or you are lying to the\nAmerican people because this bill represents, in the text of this bill,\nthe largest and greatest loss of healthcare in American history.\n  Seventeen million Americans will lose their healthcare with this\nbill, not undocumented people, not the disgusting term ``illegal,'' but\n17 million Americans will have their healthcare cut from this bill.\n  On this point of tax on tips, as one of the only people in this body\nwho has lived off of tips, I want to tell you a little bit about the\nscam of that text, a little bit of the fine print there.\n  The cap on that is $25,000, while you are jacking up taxes on people\nwho make less than $50,000 across the United States, while taking away\ntheir SNAP, while taking away their Medicaid, and while kicking them\noff of the ACA and their healthcare extensions.\n  If you are at home and living off tips, you do the math. Is that\nworth it to you? Losing all your healthcare, not being able to feed\nyour babies, and not being able to put a diaper on their bottom in\nexchange for what?\n  This bill is a deal with the devil. It explodes our national debt. It\nmilitarizes our entire economy. It strips away healthcare and basic\ndignity from the American people. For what? To give Elon Musk a tax\nbreak, and billionaires, the greedy, taking our Nation.\n  We cannot stand for it, and we will not support it. You should be\nashamed.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Members are reminded to refrain from\nengaging in personalities toward the President, and Members are\nreminded to direct their remarks to the Chair.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Texas\n(Mr. Nehls).\n  Mr. NEHLS. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to discuss an important\nprovision in the big, beautiful bill.\n  I was proud to introduce the Endowment Tax Fairness Act, which would\n\n[[Page H3046]]\n\ntax the endowment profits of private, elite universities at 21 percent,\nraising an estimated--listen to me--$70 billion to $100 billion over 10\nyears.\n  The Senate gutted this provision and reduced it to under $1 billion\nannually to protect elite universities that take hundreds of millions\nof dollars annually in Federal tax dollars.\n  We were given instructions to generate revenue to pay for President\nTrump's wonderful priorities. We are not taxing the endowment itself.\nHarvard has $53 billion. We are not taxing that. We are just going to\ntax the net earnings on their investments at 21 percent, which is equal\nto the corporate tax rate.\n  What did the Senate do? They reduced it to 8 percent, just under 8\npercent.\n  It is about time that we get these universities to pay the same that\ncorporate America pays.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from\nFlorida (Ms. Wasserman Schultz).\n  Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ. Mr. Speaker, I rise to oppose this vile\nRepublican plunder of working families, seniors, and veterans, all so\nthe richest Americans can be showered with even more wealth.\n  This billionaire bailout would strip healthcare coverage from 17\nmillion Americans, nearly 2 million in my State of Florida. It would\npush millions into crowded, costly emergency rooms and saddle them with\nmedical debt.\n  Trump's big, ugly bill also steals record food assistance from\nmillions of kids, seniors, and veterans.\n  It makes cancer screenings and prenatal care harder to get by\ndefunding Planned Parenthood.\n  It cripples solar and wind projects and kills millions of clean,\ngreen manufacturing and construction jobs, all so the rich can get huge\ntax breaks.\n  No family is unscathed because this bill also blows up the national\ndebt by $4 trillion, which drives up interest rates on car loans and\nmortgages and triggers billions in Medicare cuts, cutting healthcare\nfor our seniors.\n  This bill makes life less affordable and more painful. Instead of\nuplifting lives, it will end them.\n  When history looks back on this bill, its legacy will be: Trump lied,\nand people died.\n  Vote ``no.''\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Members are reminded, once again, to refrain\nfrom engaging in personalities toward the President.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from\nRhode Island (Mr. Magaziner).\n  Mr. MAGAZINER. Mr. Speaker, when we say that the Republican Party has\nturned into a cult, this is what we mean. Our Republican colleagues are\npushing a bill that would throw their constituents under the bus, a\nbill that flies in the face of everything they claim to stand for, all\nbecause Donald Trump wants a bill-signing photo op by the Fourth of\nJuly.\n  My Republican colleagues know that this bill will cost 17 million\nAmericans their health insurance. They know that nursing homes in their\nown districts will have to close down. They know that, under this bill,\n$5 trillion of debt is being added that will be paid for by my\nchildren, your children, and their children for generations to come so\nthat today's billionaires can get a tax break.\n  They know that this bill is unpopular. Many of their vulnerable\nMembers will lose reelection over it, but the cult leader has decided.\nHe wants his photo op on July Fourth, and our Kool-Aid-drinking\ncolleagues are going along with it.\n  They know this is wrong. They still have a chance to do right by\ntheir constituents and their convictions.\n  Vote ``no'' on this bill.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the very distinguished\ngentleman from South Carolina (Mr. Wilson).\n  Mr. WILSON of South Carolina. Mr. Speaker, I thank Chairwoman\nVirginia Foxx of North Carolina for yielding.\n  Mr. Speaker, indeed, Republicans were elected last November, but with\npromises made, promises kept.\n  Despite the extraordinarily ignorant lies on the other side, the\nAmerican people know that the bill that we will be voting on today\nreduces taxes, creating jobs.\n  It is the elimination of taxes on tips and overtime. It provides for\nsecuring the border. It provides for energy independence. It provides\nfor the ability to have peace through strength. All of this is in the\nbill.\n  On compassion, it is not compassion to support programs that are\nultimately going to fail. Republicans want people who need assistance\nto receive assistance.\n  Margaret Thatcher has identified what they are proposing, and that is\nthat socialism will work until you run out of other people's money to\nspend.\n  They are putting the poor people of America at risk. We are the ones\nwith compassion.\n  Additionally, with promises made, promises kept by Donald Trump, I\nhave lived it. I led the delegation to move the Embassy from Tel Aviv\nto Jerusalem. He did that. People at the State Department said that we\nshouldn't do it because it leads to dislocation. No, it led to the\nEmbassy being in Jerusalem, and it led to the Abraham Accords.\n  We know that last week the President was advised not to bomb Iran,\nthat it would lead to World War III. No, it has led to a cease-fire and\nthe ability to have the Abraham Accords extended to other countries,\nincluding Syria.\n  I am really grateful that Lindsey Graham was such an adviser. The\nPresident acted despite the naysayers that we have all around us.\n  I just appreciate Donald Trump. Promises made, promises kept.\n\n                              {time}  1140\n\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from New\nYork (Mr. Kennedy).\n  Mr. KENNEDY of New York. Mr. Speaker, I am an occupational therapist.\nI helped people live the fullest life they could given the cards they\nwere dealt. I worked at a school for children with disabilities and a\nnursing home, helping seniors maintain their independence.\n  I know exactly what it means to cut $1 trillion from Medicare,\nMedicaid, and the Affordable Care Act, which is exactly what this big,\nugly bill does.\n  Taking away healthcare for 17 million Americans won't make us any\nhealthier. Stealing food away from the neediest children, seniors, and\nveterans won't make us any stronger. Giving billionaires a tax break\nwon't make us any richer. Children will go hungry. Seniors will lose\ntheir healthcare. Students will lose their financial aid. Hospitals\nwill close. Americans will die.\n  Mr. Speaker, I urge my Republican colleagues to stand up; grow a\nspine; stop bowing down to your king, Donald Trump; represent your\nconstituents like you were elected to do; and vote ``no'' on this\nhorrible, big, ugly bill.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. For the third time, the Chair would remind\nMembers not to engage in personalities toward the President, or they\nwill be called out of order.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, if there are no other Republican Members\nwilling to speak for this bill, we can send some Members over to you\njust to state the facts as to what is in this bill. Let's do the public\na service.\n  Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Maryland (Mr.\nOlszewski).\n  Mr. OLSZEWSKI. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to remind my colleagues that\nthis bill is more than words on paper. The policies we are debating\ntoday have real impacts on real people, people like 4-year-old Amir\nRich, who visited my office earlier this month. Amir was born at just 2\npounds and spent 452 days in the hospital.\n  Today, although he still depends on feeding tubes and oxygen tanks,\nhe is thriving. He is walking and able to speak. He lit up my office\nwith energy. That is thanks to the care he received under Medicaid.\n  Christina was forced to leave her 16-year career in corrections to\nbecome his full-time caregiver, placing a significant financial strain\non their family. In the face of rising costs for American families,\nMedicaid has become a vital lifeline helping to cover the kind of care\nAmir needs.\n  The bill before us guts these lifelines like Medicaid and CHIP. These\nprograms cover nearly half of all American children.\n\n[[Page H3047]]\n\n  For families like Christina and Amir, today's vote is a matter of\nlife and death. I encourage my colleagues to look at Amir. Look at him\nand oppose this reckless bill. Protect the vital support systems that\nserve millions of Americans.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Utah\n(Mr. Kennedy).\n  Mr. KENNEDY of Utah. Mr. Speaker, it is a pleasure to be here and\nspeak in favor of the rule for the big, beautiful bill.\n  As a provider of healthcare myself, as a doctor, and as a recipient\nof Medicaid services--my first three children were born on Medicaid--in\naddition to the fact that as a child, I was receiving food assistance\nnot only from free school lunch programs but church programs,\nrecognizing the vital need associated with Medicaid as well as with\nthese food programs, we need to rightsize these programs.\n  Mr. Speaker, if we don't take a different trajectory, these programs\nwill collapse under the economic failures of prior administrations. The\nreality behind this is, this bill that we are discussing today is\ninsisting on work requirements associated with the recipients of\nMedicaid.\n  If you are an able-bodied, working adult, you should be able to go\nout and find a job. If you can't find a job, you need to go to a\ntraining program and try to find training so that you can get a job and\nultimately get off Medicaid.\n  One of the components about Medicaid, we all know, is that it was\nformed in favor of pregnant women, disabled people, as well as the\nelderly. What the Republicans are trying to do is rightsize the\nMedicaid program so that it survives for the long-term, vital needs of\nthe people of the future.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, if you can't find a job, just enroll in a\ntraining program. That is hard to do when Republicans are cutting and\ngutting the training programs that exist in this country.\n  Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms.\nJohnson).\n  Ms. JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I have been listening to this\ndebate, and I am struck by the appalling ability of the Members of the\nother side who are so afraid of this President. They are willing to lie\nto the American people because they fear the tweet of a President more\nthan they fear the wrath of the voters at the ballot box. This will\ncome home to roost because 17 million people are going to lose their\nhealthcare.\n  In Texas, we are one of the largest creators of clean energy jobs.\nTexas is the energy State. I am proud to be an energy State. We have\nvast amounts of oil and gas jobs, but we also are the largest creator\nof clean energy jobs. We will lose millions of jobs in our State\nbecause Republicans of this delegation are going to vote for this bill.\n  In response to Representative Nehls, I am a proud graduate of the\nUniversity of Texas. I think Texas A&M and our elite University of\nTexas deserve to have the funding in our universities.\n  With this bill, we must vote it down. I condemn the Republicans in\nthe State of Texas who are going to harm our State with their support\nof this bill.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from\nTexas (Mr. Castro).\n  Mr. CASTRO of Texas. Three years ago today, I was diagnosed with\nneuroendocrine cancer. That day, my youngest child, my daughter, turned\n2 months old.\n  There is a drug that I have to take every month, every 28 days, and\nthe first time I saw the bill for that, the list price on that drug was\n$24,000 per injection. For people that don't have insurance or Medicaid\nor aren't covered, they are not getting that shot. They are not going\nto survive, some of them. This is a choice for some of you between your\ncareer and saving people's lives.\n  There are so many folks who have reached out over the last several\nmonths panicking about their disabled children, about their senior\ncitizen parents who are in nursing homes, people struggling with\ncancer, Alzheimer's, dementia, sickle cell, diabetes, all of these\nillnesses. You have the power today to make sure that they can live\nwith dignity and stay alive, or you can choose your career. That is\nyour choice.\n  We choose to keep people alive. We choose to have healthcare in this\ncountry. We refuse to cut healthcare for 17 million people nationwide\nand 1.6 million people in Texas because it is wrong and it is immoral\nand we can take a different course.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from\nWashington (Mr. Baumgartner).\n  Mr. BAUMGARTNER. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of the big,\nbeautiful bill.\n  At its heart, the big, beautiful bill is a measure that will make\nAmerica both wealthier and safer. I am inspired in thinking about the\nbig, beautiful bill of not only this President but two of my favorite\nformer Presidents.\n  The first would be President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, who realized--\ngetting the appropriate quote--realized the negative impacts of high\ntax rates. Indeed, roughly 60 years ago, President Kennedy warned:\n``The largest single barrier to full employment of our manpower and\nresources and to a higher rate of economic growth is the\nunrealistically heavy drag of Federal income taxes on private\npurchasing power, initiative, and incentive.''\n  Indeed, I have little doubt that President Kennedy would be a big fan\nof the big, beautiful bill.\n  Similarly, President Reagan realized peace through strength was how\nAmerica could defeat the communist Soviet Union. He realized how\nmissile defense was key to facing up to the challenge of the\ncommunists.\n  Today, the big, beautiful bill puts much-needed funding into missile\ndefense through the Golden Dome system.\n  I encourage every American that cares about making our country\nwealthier and safer to support the big, beautiful bill.\n\n                              {time}  1150\n\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from\nMichigan (Ms. Stevens).\n  Ms. STEVENS. Mr. Speaker, this bill makes me sick to my stomach. I\nhave met with over 200 manufacturers in my district, and the one thing\nthat I hear over and over again is that the cost of everything is going\nup.\n  This administration is now, yet again, trying to raise prices on\nworking Michiganders. This bill in Michigan will kick 750,000 people\noff their Medicaid. It will eliminate critical investments in Michigan\nmanufacturing. It means, for Michiganders, that costs will continue to\ngo up and up.\n  As someone who served as the chief of staff on the U.S. auto rescue\nin the Obama administration, I know what it means to see Michiganders\nstruggling. I know what it means when Michiganders have to choose\nbetween paying their bills and paying for lifesaving healthcare, all\nwhile billionaires get a tax cut.\n  This bill, Mr. Speaker, makes me sick to my stomach, and I urge\neveryone to vote ``no.''\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I feel the excitement on the other side of\nthe aisle.\n  Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from Ohio (Mrs.\nSykes).\n  Mrs. SYKES. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to oppose this terrible bill\nthat is a bad deal for Ohio, the residents of Ohio's 13th Congressional\nDistrict, and the people of the United States of America.\n  When I was first elected, I told the people of Ohio's 13th\nCongressional District that it may be my name on the ballot, but when I\nwin, we are all going to Washington together. I made that promise\nbecause, as a Representative of my district, it is my responsibility to\nmake sure that my constituents' needs are being addressed here in\nWashington.\n  The people in Ohio's 13th Congressional District need lower costs.\nThe people in Ohio's 13th Congressional District need access to care.\nThe people in Ohio's 13th District need opportunity, opportunity to\nwork, to buy a house, and to live their American Dream. Yet, this bill\ndoes none of that.\n  Instead, it kicks 17 million people off their healthcare and makes\nlife more expensive. People don't have extra money to pay for\nbillionaires' yachts and monthslong vacations.\n  This bill takes money away from hardworking Americans and gives it to\n\n[[Page H3048]]\n\nthe rich. It takes food away from children, making their bellies\nhungry.\n  In my district, Mr. Speaker, 30,000 jobs are in jeopardy. I don't\nwant to hear another word from Republicans about people not wanting to\nwork when they are sending them to the unemployment line.\n  Mr. Speaker, this is a bad bill. Do not allow the people in my\ndistrict to be unemployed, hungry, and without the ability to live\ntheir American Dream.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.\n  Mr. Speaker, my Democratic colleagues continue to rail against\ncommonsense community engagement requirements, which require able-\nbodied adults without an exemption to spend 20 hours per week working,\nvolunteering, enrolling in school, or participating in a work\ndevelopment program.\n  Let's be perfectly clear. These work requirements apply only to able-\nbodied adults without young dependents who don't have a disqualifying\ncondition.\n  Individuals who are exempt from these requirements include pregnant\nwomen, individuals under the age of 19 or over the age of 64, foster\nyouth and former foster youth under the age of 26, members of Tribes,\nindividuals who are considered medically frail, and individuals who are\nalready in compliance with the work requirements under Temporary\nAssistance for Needy Families, TANF, or the Supplemental Nutrition\nAssistance Program, SNAP.\n  The list goes on, but our priority remains the same. It is to root\nout waste, fraud, and abuse and to strengthen and sustain Medicaid for\nthose for whom the program was intended to serve: expectant mothers,\nchildren with disabilities, the poor, and the elderly.\n  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, Democratic Leader Jeffries has an\namendment to strike the devastating cuts to healthcare and SNAP, and I\nyield to the gentlewoman from New York (Ms. Clarke), the chair of the\nCongressional Black Caucus, for the purpose of a unanimous consent\nrequest.\n  Ms. CLARKE of New York. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend\nthe rule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects\nagainst any cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Womack). Does the gentlewoman from North\nCarolina yield for that purpose?\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, all time yielded is for the purpose of debate,\nand I do not yield for that request.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina does not\nyield. Therefore, the unanimous consent request cannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Louisiana\n(Mr. Carter) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. CARTER of Louisiana. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to\namend the rule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects\nagainst any Medicaid cuts and any cuts to SNAP.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, all time yielded is for the purpose of debate.\nI do not yield for that request.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair understands that the gentlewoman\nfrom North Carolina has not yielded for that purpose. Therefore, the\nunanimous consent request cannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Georgia\n(Mrs. McBath) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mrs. McBATH. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Once again, the Chair understands that the\ngentlewoman from North Carolina will not yield for that purpose.\nTherefore, the unanimous consent request cannot be entertained.\n\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Minnesota\n(Ms. Omar) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. OMAR. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has\nexpressed a desire not to entertain the unanimous consent request for\nthat purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request cannot be\nentertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Pennsylvania\n(Mr. Evans) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. EVANS of Pennsylvania. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to\namend the rule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects\nagainst any cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Given that the gentlewoman from North\nCarolina will not accept the request for the unanimous consent agenda,\nthe purpose, therefore, cannot be entertained at this time.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from New York\n(Mr. Meeks) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. MEEKS. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Once again, the Chair understands that the\ngentlewoman from North Carolina has not yielded for that purpose.\nTherefore, the unanimous consent request cannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Nevada (Mr.\nHorsford) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. HORSFORD. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from New Jersey\n(Mrs. Watson Coleman) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend\nthe rule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects\nagainst any cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair understands that the gentlewoman\nfrom North Carolina has not yielded for that purpose. Therefore, the\nunanimous consent request cannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Ohio (Mrs.\nBeatty) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mrs. BEATTY. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Once again, the Chair understands that the\ngentlewoman from North Carolina has not yielded for that purpose.\nTherefore, the unanimous consent request cannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from North\nCarolina (Mrs. Foushee) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mrs. FOUSHEE. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair understands the gentlewoman from\nNorth Carolina has not yielded for that purpose. Therefore, the\nunanimous consent request cannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Alabama\n(Ms. Sewell) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. SEWELL. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from California\n(Ms. Waters) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. WATERS. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\n\n[[Page H3049]]\n\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n\n                              {time}  1200\n\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, are you sure you don't want to check with\nthe gentlewoman from North Carolina just in case she changed her mind?\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair is pretty confident.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from North\nCarolina (Ms. Adams) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. ADAMS. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina (Ms.\nFoxx) has not yielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous\nconsent request cannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Maryland\n(Mr. Mfume) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. MFUME. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Florida\n(Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick) for the purpose of unanimous consent\nrequest.\n  Mrs. CHERFILUS-McCORMICK. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to\namend the rule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects\nagainst any cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Illinois\n(Mr. Jackson) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. JACKSON of Illinois. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to\namend the rule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects\nagainst any cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms.\nCrockett) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. CROCKETT. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Ohio (Mrs.\nSykes) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mrs. SYKES. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from\nConnecticut (Mrs. Hayes) for the purpose of a unanimous consent\nrequest.\n  Mrs. HAYES. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Ohio (Ms.\nBrown) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. BROWN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Virginia\n(Ms. McClellan) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. McCLELLAN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from California\n(Ms. Simon) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. SIMON. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Oregon\n(Ms. Bynum) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. BYNUM. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Maryland\n(Mr. Ivey) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n\n  Mr. IVEY. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from New Jersey\n(Mrs. McIver) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mrs. McIVER. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Rhode Island\n(Mr. Amo) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. AMO. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from California\n(Ms. Kamlager-Dove) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. KAMLAGER-DOVE. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the\nrule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against\nany cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Missouri\n(Mr. Bell) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. BELL. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n\n[[Page H3050]]\n\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from New York\n(Mr. Torres) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. TORRES of New York. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend\nthe rule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects\nagainst any cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Louisiana\n(Mr. Fields) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. FIELDS. Mr. Speaker, I request unanimous consent to amend the\nrule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against\nany cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Georgia\n(Ms. Williams) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. WILLIAMS of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to\namend the rule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects\nagainst any cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Alabama (Mr.\nFigures) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. FIGURES. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid or SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Illinois\n(Mr. Davis) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. DAVIS of Illinois. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend\nthe rules to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects\nagainst any cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n\n                              {time}  1210\n\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Washington\n(Ms. Strickland) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. STRICKLAND. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the\nrule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against\nany cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Texas (Mr.\nGreen) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. GREEN of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the\nrule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against\nany cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Georgia (Mr.\nBishop) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. BISHOP. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from\nPennsylvania (Ms. Lee) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. LEE of Pennsylvania. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to\namend the rule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects\nagainst any cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Florida (Mr.\nFrost) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. FROST. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Illinois\n(Ms. Kelly) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. KELLY of Illinois. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend\nthe rule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects\nagainst any cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from New Jersey\n(Mr. Conaway) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. CONAWAY. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Indiana (Mr.\nCarson) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. CARSON. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms.\nGarcia) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. GARCIA of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend\nthe rule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects\nagainst any cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Oregon\n(Ms. Bonamici) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. BONAMICI. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Oregon\n(Ms. Salinas) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. SALINAS. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms.\nJohnson) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend\nthe\n\n[[Page H3051]]\n\nrule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against\nany cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Washington\n(Ms. Randall) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. RANDALL. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Illinois\n(Ms. Budzinski) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. BUDZINSKI. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Hawaii\n(Ms. Tokuda) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. TOKUDA. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from New York\n(Ms. Meng) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. MENG. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Michigan\n(Mrs. Dingell) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mrs. DINGELL. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from\nPennsylvania (Ms. Houlahan) for the purpose of a unanimous consent\nrequest.\n  Ms. HOULAHAN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Texas\n(Mrs. Fletcher) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mrs. FLETCHER. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from New York\n(Mr. Tonko) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. TONKO. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from\nMassachusetts (Ms. Pressley) for the purpose of a unanimous consent\nrequest.\n  Ms. PRESSLEY. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n\n                         Parliamentary Inquiry\n\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, parliamentary inquiry.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman will state his parliamentary\ninquiry.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, does one Republican Member have the power\nto block an amendment to protect Medicaid and SNAP?\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The manager of the pending resolution would\nhave to yield for any such amendment.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. That kind of seems like a silly rule.\n  Anyway, Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from New York (Ms.\nGillen) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. GILLEN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Minnesota\n(Ms. Morrison) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. MORRISON. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n\n                              {time}  1220\n\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from California\n(Ms. Brownley) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. BROWNLEY. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Once again, the gentlewoman from North\nCarolina has not yielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous\nconsent request may not be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from California\n(Mrs. Torres) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mrs. TORRES of California. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to\namend the rule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects\nagainst any cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Ohio (Ms.\nKaptur) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. KAPTUR. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from California\n(Mr. Lieu) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. LIEU. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\n\n[[Page H3052]]\n\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from California\n(Ms. Chu) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. CHU. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from New York\n(Ms. Velazquez) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Oregon\n(Ms. Dexter) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. DEXTER. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Georgia (Mr.\nJohnson) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend\nthe rule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects\nagainst any cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from New York\n(Mr. Kennedy) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. KENNEDY of New York. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to\namend the rule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects\nagainst any cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Ohio (Mr.\nLandsman) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. LANDSMAN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Maryland\n(Ms. Elfreth) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. ELFRETH. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Delaware\n(Ms. McBride) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. McBRIDE. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Pennsylvania\n(Mr. Deluzio) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. DELUZIO. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Maryland\n(Mr. Olszewski) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. OLSZEWSKI. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Kentucky\n(Mr. McGarvey) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. McGARVEY. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Vermont\n(Ms. Balint) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. BALINT. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Florida (Mr.\nSoto) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. SOTO. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Oregon\n(Ms. Hoyle) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. HOYLE of Oregon. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend\nthe rule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects\nagainst any cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from California\n(Mr. Cisneros) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. CISNEROS. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from New Jersey\n(Mr. Norcross) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. NORCROSS. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Mississippi\n(Mr. Thompson) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to\n\n[[Page H3053]]\n\namend the rule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects\nagainst any cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from New Jersey\n(Mr. Menendez) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. MENENDEZ. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from California\n(Mr. Takano) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. TAKANO. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from California\n(Mr. Ruiz) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. RUIZ. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Florida\n(Ms. Castor) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. CASTOR of Florida. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend\nthe rule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects\nagainst any cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n\n                              {time}  1230\n\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from California\n(Mr. DeSaulnier) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. DeSAULNIER. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the\nrule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against\nany cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from California\n(Ms. Matsui) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. MATSUI. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from New\nHampshire (Mr. Pappas) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. PAPPAS. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Nevada\n(Ms. Titus) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. TITUS. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Virginia\n(Mr. Subramanyam) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. SUBRAMANYAM. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the\nrule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against\nany cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from New Jersey\n(Ms. Sherrill) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. SHERRILL. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from New York\n(Mr. Mannion) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. MANNION. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from\nMassachusetts (Mr. Lynch) for the purpose of a unanimous consent\nrequest.\n  Mr. LYNCH. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from South\nCarolina (Mr. Clyburn) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. CLYBURN. Mr. Speaker, I request that we allow a vote to let the\n10-20-30 formula be applied to the low-income areas affected by this\nbill.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Does the gentleman seek unanimous consent?\n  Mr. CLYBURN. Mr. Speaker, I seek unanimous consent.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Does the gentlewoman yield for that purpose?\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I do not yield.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina does not\nyield for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request cannot\nbe entertained.\n  Mr. CLYBURN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman has been clear. She is not\nentertaining any unanimous consent requests. She will not yield to that\npoint. Therefore, it cannot be entertained at this time.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from California\n(Mr. Carbajal) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. CARBAJAL. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms.\nEscobar) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. ESCOBAR. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n\n[[Page H3054]]\n\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Washington\n(Ms. DelBene) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. DelBENE. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Washington\n(Ms. Jayapal) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. JAYAPAL. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Tennessee\n(Mr. Cohen) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. COHEN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the spirit of Jesus as it is spoken in Matthew: He was\nsick, and I healed him. He was hungry, and I fed him.\n  Medicare, healthcare, SNAP payments, and nutrition payments should\nnot be taken away from fellow passengers on this Earth.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Further, the Chair would advise Members that although a unanimous\nconsent to consider a measure is covered by the Speaker's guidelines\nfor recognition, embellishments constitute debate and, as such, can\nbecome an imposition on the time of the Member who is yielded for that\npurpose.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from North\nCarolina (Ms. Ross) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. ROSS. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from California\n(Mr. Whitesides) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. WHITESIDES. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the\nrule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against\nany cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from New\nHampshire (Ms. Goodlander) for the purpose of a unanimous consent\nrequest.\n  Ms. GOODLANDER. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the\nrule to make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against\nany cuts to Medicaid and to SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from California\n(Mr. Thompson) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. THOMPSON of California. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to\namend the rule and to make in order the amendment at the desk that\nprotects against any cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Illinois\n(Mr. Schneider) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. SCHNEIDER. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Rhode Island\n(Mr. Magaziner) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. MAGAZINER. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Texas (Mr.\nCasar) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. CASAR. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose. Therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n\n                              {time}  1240\n\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Arizona (Mr.\nStanton) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Mr. STANTON. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule\nto make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any\ncuts to Medicaid or SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and, therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the distinguished woman from\nCalifornia (Ms. Pelosi) for the purpose of a unanimous consent request.\n  Ms. PELOSI. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to amend the rule to\nmake in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts\nto Medicaid and SNAP.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has not\nyielded for that purpose, and, therefore, the unanimous consent request\ncannot be entertained.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, over 100 Democratic Members just asked to\nallow an amendment to protect Medicaid and SNAP, to just give us a\nvote. That is all I ask.\n  I will say that we are here standing up for the American people, no\nmatter where they live, and this is what it looks like to fight for the\nAmerican people, to make sure that this administration and this\nRepublican Congress don't rip away their healthcare and their food\nbenefits. That is disgusting.\n  In the gentlewoman from North Carolina's district alone, 142,000 of\nher constituents would lose some or all of their SNAP benefits, and\nfive rural hospitals are at risk of closure.\n  My Democratic colleagues and I are here to help people, not to screw\nthem over.\n  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, wow, that gambit was riveting.\n  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, may I inquire as to how much time is\nremaining.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Massachusetts has 7\nminutes remaining. The gentlewoman from North Carolina has 7\\3/4\\\nminutes remaining.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Florida\n(Mr. Fine).\n  Mr. FINE. Mr. Speaker, as I sat here and listened to that panoply of\nspeeches or motions over the last few seconds, I was reminded of the\nfact that when we say there should be no cuts to Medicaid, we are\nsaying there should be no\n\n[[Page H3055]]\n\ncuts to illegal immigrants who are getting Medicaid.\n  We live in a world where we spend more money than we bring in, and it\nis not fair to actual Americans to be forced to take on additional debt\nto give benefits to people who are not in this country legally.\n  Mr. Speaker, I note that the Democrats have not proposed a solution\nthat would allow us to continue to give benefits to people who\nshouldn't be here anyway and pay for them without our children going\ninto future debt. We must keep that in mind.\n  I am here to fight for Americans, and that is what this bill does.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I don't know if the gentleman has ever\nread the Medicaid statute, but undocumented immigrants are not entitled\nto receive Medicaid benefits, and they don't.\n  Our solution to make sure that our children are not saddled with debt\nis to not give billionaires, millionaires, and corporations big tax\ncuts. Jeff Bezos doesn't need a tax cut.\n  Why don't you come down here and explain to people why it is so\nimportant that you protect his tax cuts? We tried to go after the\nbillionaire tax cuts in the Rules Committee last night, and every\nsingle Republican voted ``no.''\n  That is how we are going to do it. We are going to invest in people\nwho need help. We are going to make sure people have healthcare. We are\ngoing to make sure people have food assistance. We are not going to\nscrew them over.\n  Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from California (Mr.\nDeSaulnier).\n  Mr. DeSAULNIER. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Massachusetts\nfor yielding.\n  Mr. Speaker, this bill would cause household resources for the\npoorest Americans to decrease while the obscenely rich will get richer.\n  I offered two amendments in the Rules Committee, one to prevent\npeople with disabilities from being kicked off Medicaid and one to help\nlow-income students afford an education that they earned.\n  Unfortunately, Republicans refused to consider them, as they yet\nagain worked through the dead of night to rip off hardworking Americans\nand give tax breaks to the richest Americans who don't need them.\n  Even FOX News reports that it is projected to increase the Federal\ndeficit by $4 trillion over the next decade.\n  This bill is nothing more than a vanity project for the President,\nand it betrays the American people. I strongly oppose this reckless\nlegislation and urge my colleagues to do the right thing.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the distinguished\ngentleman from Texas (Mr. Babin).\n  Mr. BABIN. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in very strong support of H.R.\n1, President Trump's one big, beautiful bill.\n  Here we are, despite months of our Democratic colleagues' best\nefforts to delay, fearmonger, and mislead the public about this bill,\nand we are ready to deliver for the American people.\n  Here is the thing about fear-mongering. You can only say ``the sky is\nfalling'' so many times before folks start waking up and seeing for\nthemselves exactly what is going on.\n  The One Big Beautiful Bill Act secures our border. It prevents the\nsingle largest tax increase in American history and refocuses safety\nnet programs for those who truly need them, not the ones shamming.\nThen, it reinvigorates our Armed Forces, where we saw a diminution for\n4 long years under the Biden administration.\n  Mr. Speaker, it is high time that we deliver this to the President's\ndesk for a signature. This is promises made and promises kept, and I am\nvery proud to support this bill.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, the big, ugly bill is going to throw 16\nmillion people off of healthcare and give people like Jeff Bezos,\nmillionaires and billionaires, a tax cut. If that is what you are\nabout, I hate to tell you, that is not what the American people voted\nfor.\n  Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from New York (Mr.\nRiley).\n  Mr. RILEY of New York. Mr. Speaker, where I come from, we make\nthings. Generations woke up before the crack of dawn, went off to the\nfactory, punched a clock, worked their hands to the bone, and came home\nand counted nickels to make sure they could keep a roof over the kids'\nheads and keep food on the tables.\n  We have kept our heads down. We have kept our sleeves rolled up. We\nhave kept our shoulder to the wheel. All we have asked for is a fair\nshot and for this place to stop screwing us over, but you can't help\nyourselves.\n  You got us into terrible trade deals that made Wall Street rich and\nshipped all of our jobs overseas. You bail out the banks while\nneglecting rural America. You have rigged the economy so the corporate\nPACs that are funding your campaigns make huge profits, jacking up\ncosts on folks who can't afford it, and now this.\n  This bill will kill good, blue-collar manufacturing jobs that we need\nto rebuild the economy in this country, close rural hospitals, and\ndefund healthcare, all to give trillions of dollars in tax cuts to your\ncronies.\n  Don't tell me you give a shit about the middle class when all you are\ndoing is shitting on the middle class.\n\n                              {time}  1250\n\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair would remind both sides of two\nthings. Please direct your remarks to the Chair and avoid vulgar speak.\nWe do have families here. The gentleman will not be recognized.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, thank you for reminding us of the language we\nshould be using in this Chamber.\n  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I hope when the President comes here next,\nyou will admonish him for the language he uses.\n  Mr. Speaker, I yield one minute to the gentlewoman from Delaware (Ms.\nMcBride).\n  Ms. McBRIDE. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this big, ugly\nbill. Let's be clear: This bill is TrumpCare. And TrumpCare means 17\nmillion more Americans will be uninsured and all the rest of us will be\npaying higher costs and driving further to get care.\n  Over the last several months, I have met with hundreds of\nDelawareans--parents, patients, providers, hospital leaders, teachers,\nnurses, people from all across the State of Delaware--and everyone was\nasking us, pleading with us, to kill this bill.\n  Are my Republican colleagues meeting with their constituents? Are\nthey ignoring them? Do they even care?\n  Every ``yes'' vote shows very clearly that they don't. This bill is\ntrickle-down cruelty, and people will die because of it.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, as the President has said numerous times,\nthere will be no cuts to Medicaid. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act\nprotects and strengthens Medicaid for those who rely on it--pregnant\nwomen, children, seniors, people with disabilities, and low-income\nfamilies--while eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse.\n  The One Big Beautiful Bill Act removes illegal aliens, enforces work\nrequirements, and protects Medicaid for the truly vulnerable.\n  For our colleagues on the other side who say illegal aliens are not\nreceiving this, we understand that 1.4 million people do not meet\ncitizenship and immigration status requirements for Medicaid enrollment\nbut would be covered under current law and programs funded by the\nStates. We know that because we have a CBO score.\n  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from\nCalifornia (Mr. Khanna).\n  Mr. KHANNA. Mr. Speaker, I never want to hear the Republicans lecture\nabout fiscal responsibility again. The last President to actually\nbalance this budget was Bill Clinton. Today, Bob Rubin and Larry\nSummers wrote an op-ed in The New York Times that every American should\nread.\n  Their budget will take the deficit up to 8 percent of GDP. It is\nhistorically unprecedented in the history of our country during\npeacetime. We never had a more reckless, deficit-exploding bill than\nwhat they are proposing.\n  The Democrats have a proposal to bring the deficits back down under 4\npercent. Bob Rubin and Larry Summers were the last ones who have done\nit. Hakeem Jeffries is leading with a sensible proposal to lower\ndeficits.\n  If you care about debt in this country, if you care about our\ngrandkids\n\n[[Page H3056]]\n\nbeing burdened with debt, if you care about a bond market devastation,\nthen you need to recognize that this bill hurts America, and you need\nto support the Democratic plan for deficit reduction.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I yield 30 seconds to the gentleman from\nKentucky (Mr. Barr).\n  Mr. BARR. Mr. Speaker, with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, President\nTrump is once again keeping his promises to the American people. He\npromised he would stop the largest tax increase in America history. He\npromised he would make the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act permanent. He promised\nhe would deliver the largest tax cut for hardworking taxpayers in\nAmerican history, and he promised to eliminate taxes on tips, overtime,\nand Social Security benefits.\n  President Trump is keeping his word. He is delivering much-needed\nrelief for the American people, and this will produce an investment\nsurge, driving real median incomes up by $10,000 relative to the\nscenario in which the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is allowed to expire.\n  To my friend from California, if he cares about fiscal\nresponsibility, stopping a $4.5 trillion tax increase stops a\nrecession. You cannot balance the budget without growth.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.\n  I don't want to close, but I am prepared to close.\n  Mr. Speaker, this bill is a moral failure. It rips healthcare away\nfrom millions. It pushes more families into hunger, and it leaves\nseniors stranded all so billionaires can keep more of what they will\nnever spend.\n  Republicans say: If you lose your job, too bad. If hospitals shut\ndown, good luck. If you can't afford groceries or insulin, figure it\nout. But if you are Big Oil, a CEO, or trust fund baby, don't worry, we\nhave got you covered. This bill is about who matters and who doesn't.\nGuess what. Working people didn't make the cut.\n  I want my Republican colleagues to know they don't have to do this.\nThey don't have to sell out their own communities. They don't have to\nvote for a bill that goes against fundamental things they claim to\nbelieve in.\n  Crazy as it sounds, they don't have to hurt people to keep Trump\nhappy. Find a spine. Find a conscience, for God's sake, because the\nAmerican people are watching. They know the difference between real\nleadership and bootlicking.\n  A vote for this bill is a vote for cruelty. It is a vote for fiscal\nirresponsibility and a vote to screw over your constituents to give\nmore to the ultra wealthy. This bill is a middle finger to working\npeople.\n  We can still stop this. We can still do the right thing. Vote ``no.''\nGo back to the table. Work with us on tax relief for people who are not\nmaking millions and billions of dollars. Don't let this be your legacy.\n  That so many of you are blindly going along with this just to please\nthe guy in the White House is shameful. You have a responsibility to\ncare for the people in your districts, and you are voting for a bill\nthat is going to throw millions off of healthcare and rip food off\nkitchen tables all across the country. It is shameful. It is shameful.\nI am disgusted that we are here debating this trash.\n\n  Mr. Speaker, I urge a ``no'' vote on the rule and a ``no'' vote on\nthe bill. I yield back the balance of my time.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Once again, I remind both sides to direct\nyour comments to the Chair.\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.\n  People who have supported the Democratic Party policies for years\ncannot come to this floor and question the morality of Republicans.\n  President Trump has his pen in hand and is waiting for the House to\ncomplete its work. We have championed this legislation for months, have\nguided it through the appropriate processes, and now we are on the 1\nyard line.\n  America deserves to move even further into the golden age. H.R. 1\nunlocks the opportunity to do that. It is time to get this done.\n  Let's be crystal clear about the content of this historic bill. We\nare restoring our borders once left defenseless and without redress. We\nare protecting our great Nation by investing in our military and\nmilitary families. We are preserving tax cuts that made the United\nStates economy the envy of the world just 8 years ago. We are reviving\nour Nation's fiscal outlook by finally cutting wasteful spending and\nunleashing our economy from harmful restraint--restore, protect,\npreserve, and revive. The failure to act would yield only the opposite.\n  Our Democrat colleagues would tear down the border wall and return us\nto open-border policies. They would have us oversee a continued decline\nin our military readiness despite unprecedented theaters of global\nconflict. They would destroy our economy in their unending appetite for\ncontinued tax increases to feed their spending binges.\n\n                              {time}  1300\n\n  Mr. Speaker, the choice is clear. We must deliver. We must deliver a\nrenewed, restored, and revived Nation and grant voters the America they\nstood for just 8 months ago.\n  Mr. Speaker, in a moment, I will offer an amendment to the\nresolution, which would correct a technical error in the rule.\n  I urge my colleagues to vote ``yes'' on the previous question,\n``yes'' on the amendment, and ``yes'' on the rule.\n\n                     Amendment offered by Ms. Foxx\n\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I offer an amendment to the resolution.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the amendment.\n  The Clerk read as follows:\n\n       At the end of the resolution, add the following:\n       The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the\n     motion to its adoption without intervening motion.\n\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I urge support for the resolution, as amended.\n  Mr. GREEN of Texas. Mr. Speaker, and still I rise now, as I did\nduring the Joint Address to Congress when I told the President and the\nNation that there is no mandate to cut Medicaid. The waste, fraud, and\nabuse argument is a facade, because no empirical evidence has been\npresented to justify cutting more than $1 trillion from Medicaid,\nMedicare, and the Affordable Care Act. These deep cuts will allow the\nrichest Americans to receive, on average, an additional $30,000\nannually, while the poorest Americans will lose approximately $700\nannually.\n  This legislation is a complete betrayal of the American people,\nextending additional tax breaks to the wealthiest individuals in this\ncountry while cutting lifesaving, urgent services for the most\nvulnerable among us. The cuts to Medicaid, Medicare, and the\nSupplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) alone will take health\ncare and food assistance away from millions of veterans, seniors, and\nfamilies across the country.\n  Congressional Democrats offered many amendments to ensure that\ncritical services would not be cut. I submitted an amendment to ensure\nthat individuals who have had their SNAP benefits stolen are able to\nreceive a reimbursement. I also submitted an amendment which would help\nraise awareness of the risk of renal medullary carcinoma, an aggressive\nform of kidney cancer found in young individuals with the sickle cell\ntrait. These common-sense amendments would not substantially add to the\ndeficit, yet they were still rejected by Congressional Republicans,\nalongside all other amendments submitted to make this bill less cruel.\n  With H.R. 1, President Trump and Congressional Republicans have shown\nthat they want a billionaire bailout at the expense of working\nfamilies.\n  The material previously referred to by Mr. McGovern is as follows:\n\n  An Amendment to H. Res. 566 Offered by Mr. McGovern of Massachusetts\n\n       Strike everything following the resolved clause and insert\n     the following:\n       That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order\n     to take from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 1) to provide\n     for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14,\n     with the Senate amendment thereto, and to consider in the\n     House, without intervention of any point of order, a motion\n     offered by the chair of the Committee on the Budget or his\n     designee that the House concur in the Senate amendment with\n     the amendment specified in section 2 of this resolution. The\n     Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as read.\n     The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided\n     among and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member\n     of the Committee on the Budget or their respective designees\n     and the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on\n     Ways and Means or their respective designees. The previous\n     question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to its\n     adoption without intervening motion.\n       Sec. 2. The amendment referred to in section 1 is as\n     follows:\n       In subtitle A of title I, strike sections 10101 through\n     10108.\n       Strike subtitle B of title VII.\n\n  Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time, and I\nmove the\n\n[[Page H3057]]\n\nprevious question on the amendment and on the resolution.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on ordering the previous\nquestion on the amendment and on the resolution.\n  The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that\nthe ayes appeared to have it.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.\n  The yeas and nays were ordered.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XX, this 15-\nminute vote on ordering the previous question will be followed by 5-\nminute votes on:\n  Adoption of the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from North\nCarolina (Ms. Foxx), if ordered; and\n  Adoption of the resolution, if ordered.\n  The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 214,\nnays 212, not voting 6, as follows:\n\n                             [Roll No. 187]\n\n                               YEAS--214\n\n     Aderholt\n     Alford\n     Allen\n     Amodei (NV)\n     Arrington\n     Babin\n     Bacon\n     Baird\n     Balderson\n     Barr\n     Barrett\n     Baumgartner\n     Bean (FL)\n     Begich\n     Bentz\n     Bergman\n     Bice\n     Biggs (AZ)\n     Biggs (SC)\n     Bilirakis\n     Boebert\n     Bost\n     Brecheen\n     Bresnahan\n     Buchanan\n     Burlison\n     Calvert\n     Cammack\n     Carey\n     Carter (GA)\n     Carter (TX)\n     Ciscomani\n     Cline\n     Cloud\n     Clyde\n     Cole\n     Collins\n     Comer\n     Crane\n     Crank\n     Crawford\n     Crenshaw\n     Davidson\n     De La Cruz\n     DesJarlais\n     Diaz-Balart\n     Donalds\n     Downing\n     Edwards\n     Ellzey\n     Emmer\n     Estes\n     Evans (CO)\n     Ezell\n     Fallon\n     Fedorchak\n     Feenstra\n     Fine\n     Finstad\n     Fischbach\n     Fitzgerald\n     Fitzpatrick\n     Fleischmann\n     Flood\n     Fong\n     Foxx\n     Franklin, Scott\n     Fry\n     Fulcher\n     Garbarino\n     Gill (TX)\n     Gimenez\n     Goldman (TX)\n     Gonzales, Tony\n     Gooden\n     Gosar\n     Graves\n     Green (TN)\n     Greene (GA)\n     Griffith\n     Grothman\n     Guest\n     Guthrie\n     Hageman\n     Hamadeh (AZ)\n     Haridopolos\n     Harrigan\n     Harris (MD)\n     Harris (NC)\n     Harshbarger\n     Hern (OK)\n     Higgins (LA)\n     Hill (AR)\n     Hinson\n     Houchin\n     Hudson\n     Huizenga\n     Hunt\n     Hurd (CO)\n     Issa\n     Jack\n     Jackson (TX)\n     James\n     Johnson (LA)\n     Johnson (SD)\n     Jordan\n     Joyce (OH)\n     Joyce (PA)\n     Kean\n     Kelly (MS)\n     Kelly (PA)\n     Kennedy (UT)\n     Kiggans (VA)\n     Kiley (CA)\n     Kim\n     Knott\n     Kustoff\n     LaHood\n     LaLota\n     LaMalfa\n     Langworthy\n     Latta\n     Lawler\n     Lee (FL)\n     Letlow\n     Loudermilk\n     Lucas\n     Luna\n     Luttrell\n     Mace\n     Mackenzie\n     Malliotakis\n     Maloy\n     Mann\n     Massie\n     Mast\n     McCaul\n     McClain\n     McClintock\n     McCormick\n     McDowell\n     McGuire\n     Messmer\n     Miller (IL)\n     Miller (OH)\n     Miller (WV)\n     Miller-Meeks\n     Mills\n     Moolenaar\n     Moore (AL)\n     Moore (NC)\n     Moore (UT)\n     Moore (WV)\n     Moran\n     Murphy\n     Nehls\n     Newhouse\n     Norman\n     Nunn (IA)\n     Obernolte\n     Onder\n     Owens\n     Palmer\n     Patronis\n     Perry\n     Pfluger\n     Reschenthaler\n     Rogers (AL)\n     Rogers (KY)\n     Rose\n     Rouzer\n     Rulli\n     Rutherford\n     Salazar\n     Scalise\n     Schmidt\n     Schweikert\n     Scott, Austin\n     Self\n     Sessions\n     Shreve\n     Simpson\n     Smith (MO)\n     Smith (NE)\n     Smith (NJ)\n     Smucker\n     Spartz\n     Stauber\n     Stefanik\n     Steil\n     Steube\n     Strong\n     Stutzman\n     Taylor\n     Tenney\n     Thompson (PA)\n     Timmons\n     Turner (OH)\n     Valadao\n     Van Drew\n     Van Duyne\n     Van Orden\n     Wagner\n     Walberg\n     Weber (TX)\n     Webster (FL)\n     Westerman\n     Wied\n     Williams (TX)\n     Wilson (SC)\n     Wittman\n     Womack\n     Yakym\n     Zinke\n\n                               NAYS--212\n\n     Adams\n     Aguilar\n     Amo\n     Ansari\n     Auchincloss\n     Balint\n     Barragan\n     Beatty\n     Bell\n     Bera\n     Beyer\n     Bishop\n     Bonamici\n     Boyle (PA)\n     Brown\n     Brownley\n     Budzinski\n     Bynum\n     Carbajal\n     Carson\n     Carter (LA)\n     Casar\n     Case\n     Casten\n     Castor (FL)\n     Castro (TX)\n     Cherfilus-McCormick\n     Chu\n     Cisneros\n     Clark (MA)\n     Clarke (NY)\n     Cleaver\n     Clyburn\n     Cohen\n     Conaway\n     Correa\n     Costa\n     Courtney\n     Craig\n     Crockett\n     Crow\n     Cuellar\n     Davids (KS)\n     Davis (IL)\n     Davis (NC)\n     Dean (PA)\n     DeGette\n     DeLauro\n     DelBene\n     Deluzio\n     DeSaulnier\n     Dexter\n     Dingell\n     Doggett\n     Elfreth\n     Escobar\n     Espaillat\n     Evans (PA)\n     Fields\n     Figures\n     Fletcher\n     Foster\n     Foushee\n     Frankel, Lois\n     Friedman\n     Frost\n     Garamendi\n     Garcia (CA)\n     Garcia (IL)\n     Garcia (TX)\n     Gillen\n     Golden (ME)\n     Goldman (NY)\n     Gomez\n     Gonzalez, V.\n     Goodlander\n     Gottheimer\n     Gray\n     Green, Al (TX)\n     Harder (CA)\n     Hayes\n     Himes\n     Horsford\n     Houlahan\n     Hoyer\n     Hoyle (OR)\n     Huffman\n     Ivey\n     Jackson (IL)\n     Jacobs\n     Jayapal\n     Jeffries\n     Johnson (GA)\n     Johnson (TX)\n     Kamlager-Dove\n     Kaptur\n     Keating\n     Kelly (IL)\n     Kennedy (NY)\n     Khanna\n     Krishnamoorthi\n     Landsman\n     Larsen (WA)\n     Larson (CT)\n     Latimer\n     Lee (NV)\n     Lee (PA)\n     Leger Fernandez\n     Levin\n     Liccardo\n     Lieu\n     Lofgren\n     Lynch\n     Magaziner\n     Mannion\n     Matsui\n     McBath\n     McBride\n     McClain Delaney\n     McClellan\n     McCollum\n     McDonald Rivet\n     McGarvey\n     McGovern\n     McIver\n     Meeks\n     Menendez\n     Meng\n     Mfume\n     Min\n     Moore (WI)\n     Morelle\n     Morrison\n     Moskowitz\n     Moulton\n     Mrvan\n     Mullin\n     Nadler\n     Neal\n     Neguse\n     Norcross\n     Ocasio-Cortez\n     Olszewski\n     Omar\n     Pallone\n     Panetta\n     Pappas\n     Pelosi\n     Perez\n     Peters\n     Pettersen\n     Pingree\n     Pocan\n     Pou\n     Pressley\n     Quigley\n     Ramirez\n     Randall\n     Raskin\n     Riley (NY)\n     Rivas\n     Ross\n     Ruiz\n     Ryan\n     Salinas\n     Sanchez\n     Scanlon\n     Schakowsky\n     Schneider\n     Scholten\n     Schrier\n     Scott (VA)\n     Scott, David\n     Sewell\n     Sherman\n     Sherrill\n     Simon\n     Smith (WA)\n     Sorensen\n     Soto\n     Stansbury\n     Stanton\n     Stevens\n     Strickland\n     Subramanyam\n     Suozzi\n     Swalwell\n     Sykes\n     Takano\n     Thanedar\n     Thompson (CA)\n     Thompson (MS)\n     Titus\n     Tlaib\n     Tokuda\n     Tonko\n     Torres (CA)\n     Torres (NY)\n     Trahan\n     Tran\n     Underwood\n     Vargas\n     Vasquez\n     Veasey\n     Velazquez\n     Vindman\n     Wasserman Schultz\n     Waters\n     Watson Coleman\n     Whitesides\n     Williams (GA)\n     Wilson (FL)\n\n                             NOT VOTING--6\n\n     Burchett\n     Dunn (FL)\n     Meuser\n     Ogles\n     Roy\n     Tiffany\n\n                              {time}  1406\n\n  Mr. VARGAS changed his vote from ``yea'' to ``nay.''\n  So the previous question was ordered.\n  The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Womack). The question is on adoption of\nthe amendment offered by the gentlewoman from North Carolina (Ms.\nFoxx).\n  The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that\nthe ayes appeared to have it.\n\n                             Recorded Vote\n\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I demand a recorded vote.\n  A recorded vote was ordered.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote.\n  The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 220,\nnoes 212, not voting 0, as follows:\n\n                             [Roll No. 188]\n\n                               AYES--220\n\n     Aderholt\n     Alford\n     Allen\n     Amodei (NV)\n     Arrington\n     Babin\n     Bacon\n     Baird\n     Balderson\n     Barr\n     Barrett\n     Baumgartner\n     Bean (FL)\n     Begich\n     Bentz\n     Bergman\n     Bice\n     Biggs (AZ)\n     Biggs (SC)\n     Bilirakis\n     Boebert\n     Bost\n     Brecheen\n     Bresnahan\n     Buchanan\n     Burchett\n     Burlison\n     Calvert\n     Cammack\n     Carey\n     Carter (GA)\n     Carter (TX)\n     Ciscomani\n     Cline\n     Cloud\n     Clyde\n     Cole\n     Collins\n     Comer\n     Crane\n     Crank\n     Crawford\n     Crenshaw\n     Davidson\n     De La Cruz\n     DesJarlais\n     Diaz-Balart\n     Donalds\n     Downing\n     Dunn (FL)\n     Edwards\n     Ellzey\n     Emmer\n     Estes\n     Evans (CO)\n     Ezell\n     Fallon\n     Fedorchak\n     Feenstra\n     Fine\n     Finstad\n     Fischbach\n     Fitzgerald\n     Fitzpatrick\n     Fleischmann\n     Flood\n     Fong\n     Foxx\n     Franklin, Scott\n     Fry\n     Fulcher\n     Garbarino\n     Gill (TX)\n     Gimenez\n     Goldman (TX)\n     Gonzales, Tony\n     Gooden\n     Gosar\n     Graves\n     Green (TN)\n     Greene (GA)\n     Griffith\n     Grothman\n     Guest\n     Guthrie\n     Hageman\n     Hamadeh (AZ)\n     Haridopolos\n     Harrigan\n     Harris (MD)\n     Harris (NC)\n     Harshbarger\n     Hern (OK)\n     Higgins (LA)\n     Hill (AR)\n     Hinson\n     Houchin\n     Hudson\n     Huizenga\n     Hunt\n     Hurd (CO)\n     Issa\n     Jack\n     Jackson (TX)\n     James\n     Johnson (LA)\n     Johnson (SD)\n     Jordan\n     Joyce (OH)\n     Joyce (PA)\n     Kean\n     Kelly (MS)\n     Kelly (PA)\n     Kennedy (UT)\n     Kiggans (VA)\n     Kiley (CA)\n     Kim\n     Knott\n     Kustoff\n     LaHood\n     LaLota\n     LaMalfa\n     Langworthy\n     Latta\n     Lawler\n     Lee (FL)\n     Letlow\n     Loudermilk\n     Lucas\n     Luna\n     Luttrell\n     Mace\n     Mackenzie\n     Malliotakis\n     Maloy\n     Mann\n     Massie\n     Mast\n     McCaul\n     McClain\n     McClintock\n     McCormick\n     McDowell\n     McGuire\n     Messmer\n     Meuser\n     Miller (IL)\n     Miller (OH)\n     Miller (WV)\n     Miller-Meeks\n     Mills\n     Moolenaar\n     Moore (AL)\n     Moore (NC)\n     Moore (UT)\n     Moore (WV)\n     Moran\n     Murphy\n     Nehls\n     Newhouse\n     Norman\n     Nunn (IA)\n     Obernolte\n     Ogles\n     Onder\n     Owens\n     Palmer\n     Patronis\n     Perry\n     Pfluger\n     Reschenthaler\n     Rogers (AL)\n     Rogers (KY)\n     Rose\n     Rouzer\n     Roy\n     Rulli\n     Rutherford\n     Salazar\n     Scalise\n     Schmidt\n     Schweikert\n     Scott, Austin\n     Self\n     Sessions\n     Shreve\n     Simpson\n     Smith (MO)\n     Smith (NE)\n     Smith (NJ)\n     Smucker\n     Spartz\n     Stauber\n     Stefanik\n     Steil\n     Steube\n     Strong\n     Stutzman\n     Taylor\n     Tenney\n     Thompson (PA)\n     Tiffany\n     Timmons\n     Turner (OH)\n     Valadao\n     Van Drew\n     Van Duyne\n     Van Orden\n     Wagner\n     Walberg\n     Weber (TX)\n     Webster (FL)\n     Westerman\n     Wied\n     Williams (TX)\n     Wilson (SC)\n     Wittman\n     Womack\n     Yakym\n     Zinke\n\n                               NOES--212\n\n     Adams\n     Aguilar\n     Amo\n     Ansari\n     Auchincloss\n     Balint\n\n[[Page H3058]]\n\n     Barragan\n     Beatty\n     Bell\n     Bera\n     Beyer\n     Bishop\n     Bonamici\n     Boyle (PA)\n     Brown\n     Brownley\n     Budzinski\n     Bynum\n     Carbajal\n     Carson\n     Carter (LA)\n     Casar\n     Case\n     Casten\n     Castor (FL)\n     Castro (TX)\n     Cherfilus-McCormick\n     Chu\n     Cisneros\n     Clark (MA)\n     Clarke (NY)\n     Cleaver\n     Clyburn\n     Cohen\n     Conaway\n     Correa\n     Costa\n     Courtney\n     Craig\n     Crockett\n     Crow\n     Cuellar\n     Davids (KS)\n     Davis (IL)\n     Davis (NC)\n     Dean (PA)\n     DeGette\n     DeLauro\n     DelBene\n     Deluzio\n     DeSaulnier\n     Dexter\n     Dingell\n     Doggett\n     Elfreth\n     Escobar\n     Espaillat\n     Evans (PA)\n     Fields\n     Figures\n     Fletcher\n     Foster\n     Foushee\n     Frankel, Lois\n     Friedman\n     Frost\n     Garamendi\n     Garcia (CA)\n     Garcia (IL)\n     Garcia (TX)\n     Gillen\n     Golden (ME)\n     Goldman (NY)\n     Gomez\n     Gonzalez, V.\n     Goodlander\n     Gottheimer\n     Gray\n     Green, Al (TX)\n     Harder (CA)\n     Hayes\n     Himes\n     Horsford\n     Houlahan\n     Hoyer\n     Hoyle (OR)\n     Huffman\n     Ivey\n     Jackson (IL)\n     Jacobs\n     Jayapal\n     Jeffries\n     Johnson (GA)\n     Johnson (TX)\n     Kamlager-Dove\n     Kaptur\n     Keating\n     Kelly (IL)\n     Kennedy (NY)\n     Khanna\n     Krishnamoorthi\n     Landsman\n     Larsen (WA)\n     Larson (CT)\n     Latimer\n     Lee (NV)\n     Lee (PA)\n     Leger Fernandez\n     Levin\n     Liccardo\n     Lieu\n     Lofgren\n     Lynch\n     Magaziner\n     Mannion\n     Matsui\n     McBath\n     McBride\n     McClain Delaney\n     McClellan\n     McCollum\n     McDonald Rivet\n     McGarvey\n     McGovern\n     McIver\n     Meeks\n     Menendez\n     Meng\n     Mfume\n     Min\n     Moore (WI)\n     Morelle\n     Morrison\n     Moskowitz\n     Moulton\n     Mrvan\n     Mullin\n     Nadler\n     Neal\n     Neguse\n     Norcross\n     Ocasio-Cortez\n     Olszewski\n     Omar\n     Pallone\n     Panetta\n     Pappas\n     Pelosi\n     Perez\n     Peters\n     Pettersen\n     Pingree\n     Pocan\n     Pou\n     Pressley\n     Quigley\n     Ramirez\n     Randall\n     Raskin\n     Riley (NY)\n     Rivas\n     Ross\n     Ruiz\n     Ryan\n     Salinas\n     Sanchez\n     Scanlon\n     Schakowsky\n     Schneider\n     Scholten\n     Schrier\n     Scott (VA)\n     Scott, David\n     Sewell\n     Sherman\n     Sherrill\n     Simon\n     Smith (WA)\n     Sorensen\n     Soto\n     Stansbury\n     Stanton\n     Stevens\n     Strickland\n     Subramanyam\n     Suozzi\n     Swalwell\n     Sykes\n     Takano\n     Thanedar\n     Thompson (CA)\n     Thompson (MS)\n     Titus\n     Tlaib\n     Tokuda\n     Tonko\n     Torres (CA)\n     Torres (NY)\n     Trahan\n     Tran\n     Underwood\n     Vargas\n     Vasquez\n     Veasey\n     Velazquez\n     Vindman\n     Wasserman Schultz\n     Waters\n     Watson Coleman\n     Whitesides\n     Williams (GA)\n     Wilson (FL)\n\n                        Parliamentary Inquiries\n\n  Mr. NEGUSE (during the vote). Mr. Speaker, I have a parliamentary\ninquiry.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman will state his parliamentary\ninquiry.\n  Mr. NEGUSE. Mr. Speaker, my understanding is that Republican\nleadership has issued a notice to their Members that they aren't\nrequired to be on the floor, essentially an informal adjournment,\nnotwithstanding that this amendment vote is pending. Is it appropriate\nunder the Rules of the House of Representatives' procedure or\nJefferson's Manual to keep a vote open while simultaneously declaring\nto Members that they are free to leave?\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. What the Chair will say to the gentleman\nfrom Colorado is that, under clause 9 of rule XX, the minimum--\nunderline minimum--time for voting is 5 minutes on this vote. This vote\nremains open, so the minimum time is 5 minutes, and there is not a\nmaximum time, nor to this Chair's knowledge is there a requirement\nthat, during the vote, the Members remain on the floor.\n  As the gentleman from Colorado would surely know, it is customary for\nMembers to vote in the middle of a vote series, leave the floor, and\nthen come back for additional votes later.\n  I hope that clears up any misunderstanding the gentleman from\nColorado would have.\n  Mr. NEGUSE. Mr. Speaker, it does, and I appreciate the Speaker's\nresponse. Is it customary for a vote to go over 1 hour?\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. It is not unprecedented, though the Chair is\nnot a historian, and so you would have to talk to people who are\nengaged in the history and the proceedings of the House of\nRepresentatives to be able to ascertain that answer. Sorry.\n  Mr. NEGUSE. Mr. Speaker, my final parliamentary procedure request:\nWould it be permissible, Mr. Speaker, or would the Speaker entertain a\nmotion to adjourn, given that Republicans don't intend to complete this\nvote?\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. That would not be in order. The gentleman\nrose for a parliamentary inquiry. That answer has been given, and that\nwould be the limitation to the gentleman's ability on the floor.\n  Mr. NEGUSE. I thank the Speaker.\n\n                         Parliamentary Inquiry\n\n  Mr. NEGUSE. Mr. Speaker, I have a parliamentary inquiry.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman will state his inquiry.\n  Mr. NEGUSE. Mr. Speaker, my understanding is that House Republicans\nhave kept this vote open longer than any other Congress in the history\nof the House of Representatives.\n  At what point will the Speaker ascertain whether this practice is\nviolative of rule XVII with respect to the order of the House or rule\nXX with respect to the voting procedures of the House?\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. What the Chair would tell the gentleman from\nColorado is that, once again, as I said a few hours ago--\n  Mr. NEGUSE. Nine hours ago, Mr. Speaker.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore.--the presiding officer is not a historian\nand so, therefore, cannot opine as to whether or not historical\nprecedent is in order or whether this will be a condition of the House\ngoing forward.\n  Mr. NEGUSE. Mr. Speaker, I asked whether or not it was violative of\nrule XVII or rule XX for Republicans to keep this vote open longer than\nany other Congress in the history of the United States House of\nRepresentatives.\n  We know for certain that this, in fact, is a new precedent that has\nbeen broken by Republicans. This is the longest--yes, Mr. Speaker.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. To the gentleman from Colorado, as was\nstated, again, several hours ago, the rule provides for a minimum\namount of time for voting, not a maximum time for voting. That minimum\ntime is, obviously, part of that rule.\n  Besides that, the Chair doesn't have any other information he could\nshare with the gentleman from Colorado that would be useful in this\ndiscussion.\n  Mr. NEGUSE. Mr. Speaker, I conclude simply by saying: Is it\npermissible under the rules for this vote to be held open for 24 hours,\n48 hours, 3 months? How long, in the Speaker's judgment, is it\npermissible to hold the vote?\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman is posing hypotheticals, and\nthe Chair is prepared to move on the vote that we are currently in.\nTherefore, the conversation ends.\n\n                              {time}  2131\n\n  So the amendment was agreed to.\n  The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the resolution, as\namended.\n  The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that\nthe ayes appeared to have it.\n  Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.\n  The yeas and nays were ordered.\n  The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote.\n  The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 219,\nnays 213, not voting 0, as follows:\n\n                             [Roll No. 189]\n\n                               YEAS--219\n\n     Aderholt\n     Alford\n     Allen\n     Amodei (NV)\n     Arrington\n     Babin\n     Bacon\n     Baird\n     Balderson\n     Barr\n     Barrett\n     Baumgartner\n     Bean (FL)\n     Begich\n     Bentz\n     Bergman\n     Bice\n     Biggs (AZ)\n     Biggs (SC)\n     Bilirakis\n     Boebert\n     Bost\n     Brecheen\n     Bresnahan\n     Buchanan\n     Burchett\n     Burlison\n     Calvert\n     Cammack\n     Carey\n     Carter (GA)\n     Carter (TX)\n     Ciscomani\n     Cline\n     Cloud\n     Clyde\n     Cole\n     Collins\n     Comer\n     Crane\n     Crank\n     Crawford\n     Crenshaw\n     Davidson\n     De La Cruz\n     DesJarlais\n     Diaz-Balart\n     Donalds\n     Downing\n     Dunn (FL)\n     Edwards\n     Ellzey\n     Emmer\n     Estes\n     Evans (CO)\n     Ezell\n     Fallon\n     Fedorchak\n     Feenstra\n     Fine\n     Finstad\n     Fischbach\n     Fitzgerald\n     Fleischmann\n     Flood\n     Fong\n     Foxx\n     Franklin, Scott\n     Fry\n     Fulcher\n     Garbarino\n     Gill (TX)\n     Gimenez\n     Goldman (TX)\n     Gonzales, Tony\n     Gooden\n     Gosar\n     Graves\n     Green (TN)\n     Greene (GA)\n     Griffith\n     Grothman\n     Guest\n     Guthrie\n     Hageman\n     Hamadeh (AZ)\n     Haridopolos\n     Harrigan\n     Harris (MD)\n     Harris (NC)\n     Harshbarger\n     Hern (OK)\n     Higgins (LA)\n     Hill (AR)\n     Hinson\n     Houchin\n     Hudson\n     Huizenga\n     Hunt\n     Hurd (CO)\n     Issa\n     Jack\n     Jackson (TX)\n     James\n     Johnson (LA)\n     Johnson (SD)\n     Jordan\n     Joyce (OH)\n     Joyce (PA)\n     Kean\n     Kelly (MS)\n     Kelly (PA)\n     Kennedy (UT)\n     Kiggans (VA)\n     Kiley (CA)\n     Kim\n     Knott\n     Kustoff\n     LaHood\n     LaLota\n     LaMalfa\n     Langworthy\n     Latta\n     Lawler\n     Lee (FL)\n     Letlow\n     Loudermilk\n     Lucas\n     Luna\n     Luttrell\n     Mace\n     Mackenzie\n     Malliotakis\n     Maloy\n     Mann\n\n[[Page H3059]]\n\n     Massie\n     Mast\n     McCaul\n     McClain\n     McClintock\n     McCormick\n     McDowell\n     McGuire\n     Messmer\n     Meuser\n     Miller (IL)\n     Miller (OH)\n     Miller (WV)\n     Miller-Meeks\n     Mills\n     Moolenaar\n     Moore (AL)\n     Moore (NC)\n     Moore (UT)\n     Moore (WV)\n     Moran\n     Murphy\n     Nehls\n     Newhouse\n     Norman\n     Nunn (IA)\n     Obernolte\n     Ogles\n     Onder\n     Owens\n     Palmer\n     Patronis\n     Perry\n     Pfluger\n     Reschenthaler\n     Rogers (AL)\n     Rogers (KY)\n     Rose\n     Rouzer\n     Roy\n     Rulli\n     Rutherford\n     Salazar\n     Scalise\n     Schmidt\n     Schweikert\n     Scott, Austin\n     Self\n     Sessions\n     Shreve\n     Simpson\n     Smith (MO)\n     Smith (NE)\n     Smith (NJ)\n     Smucker\n     Spartz\n     Stauber\n     Stefanik\n     Steil\n     Steube\n     Strong\n     Stutzman\n     Taylor\n     Tenney\n     Thompson (PA)\n     Tiffany\n     Timmons\n     Turner (OH)\n     Valadao\n     Van Drew\n     Van Duyne\n     Van Orden\n     Wagner\n     Walberg\n     Weber (TX)\n     Webster (FL)\n     Westerman\n     Wied\n     Williams (TX)\n     Wilson (SC)\n     Wittman\n     Womack\n     Yakym\n     Zinke\n\n                               NAYS--213\n\n     Adams\n     Aguilar\n     Amo\n     Ansari\n     Auchincloss\n     Balint\n     Barragan\n     Beatty\n     Bell\n     Bera\n     Beyer\n     Bishop\n     Bonamici\n     Boyle (PA)\n     Brown\n     Brownley\n     Budzinski\n     Bynum\n     Carbajal\n     Carson\n     Carter (LA)\n     Casar\n     Case\n     Casten\n     Castor (FL)\n     Castro (TX)\n     Cherfilus-McCormick\n     Chu\n     Cisneros\n     Clark (MA)\n     Clarke (NY)\n     Cleaver\n     Clyburn\n     Cohen\n     Conaway\n     Correa\n     Costa\n     Courtney\n     Craig\n     Crockett\n     Crow\n     Cuellar\n     Davids (KS)\n     Davis (IL)\n     Davis (NC)\n     Dean (PA)\n     DeGette\n     DeLauro\n     DelBene\n     Deluzio\n     DeSaulnier\n     Dexter\n     Dingell\n     Doggett\n     Elfreth\n     Escobar\n     Espaillat\n     Evans (PA)\n     Fields\n     Figures\n     Fitzpatrick\n     Fletcher\n     Foster\n     Foushee\n     Frankel, Lois\n     Friedman\n     Frost\n     Garamendi\n     Garcia (CA)\n     Garcia (IL)\n     Garcia (TX)\n     Gillen\n     Golden (ME)\n     Goldman (NY)\n     Gomez\n     Gonzalez, V.\n     Goodlander\n     Gottheimer\n     Gray\n     Green, Al (TX)\n     Harder (CA)\n     Hayes\n     Himes\n     Horsford\n     Houlahan\n     Hoyer\n     Hoyle (OR)\n     Huffman\n     Ivey\n     Jackson (IL)\n     Jacobs\n     Jayapal\n     Jeffries\n     Johnson (GA)\n     Johnson (TX)\n     Kamlager-Dove\n     Kaptur\n     Keating\n     Kelly (IL)\n     Kennedy (NY)\n     Khanna\n     Krishnamoorthi\n     Landsman\n     Larsen (WA)\n     Larson (CT)\n     Latimer\n     Lee (NV)\n     Lee (PA)\n     Leger Fernandez\n     Levin\n     Liccardo\n     Lieu\n     Lofgren\n     Lynch\n     Magaziner\n     Mannion\n     Matsui\n     McBath\n     McBride\n     McClain Delaney\n     McClellan\n     McCollum\n     McDonald Rivet\n     McGarvey\n     McGovern\n     McIver\n     Meeks\n     Menendez\n     Meng\n     Mfume\n     Min\n     Moore (WI)\n     Morelle\n     Morrison\n     Moskowitz\n     Moulton\n     Mrvan\n     Mullin\n     Nadler\n     Neal\n     Neguse\n     Norcross\n     Ocasio-Cortez\n     Olszewski\n     Omar\n     Pallone\n     Panetta\n     Pappas\n     Pelosi\n     Perez\n     Peters\n     Pettersen\n     Pingree\n     Pocan\n     Pou\n     Pressley\n     Quigley\n     Ramirez\n     Randall\n     Raskin\n     Riley (NY)\n     Rivas\n     Ross\n     Ruiz\n     Ryan\n     Salinas\n     Sanchez\n     Scanlon\n     Schakowsky\n     Schneider\n     Scholten\n     Schrier\n     Scott (VA)\n     Scott, David\n     Sewell\n     Sherman\n     Sherrill\n     Simon\n     Smith (WA)\n     Sorensen\n     Soto\n     Stansbury\n     Stanton\n     Stevens\n     Strickland\n     Subramanyam\n     Suozzi\n     Swalwell\n     Sykes\n     Takano\n     Thanedar\n     Thompson (CA)\n     Thompson (MS)\n     Titus\n     Tlaib\n     Tokuda\n     Tonko\n     Torres (CA)\n     Torres (NY)\n     Trahan\n     Tran\n     Underwood\n     Vargas\n     Vasquez\n     Veasey\n     Velazquez\n     Vindman\n     Wasserman Schultz\n     Waters\n     Watson Coleman\n     Whitesides\n     Williams (GA)\n     Wilson (FL)\n\n                              {time}  0323\n\n  Mr. MASSIE changed his vote from ``nay'' to ``yea.''\n  So the resolution, as amended, was agreed to.\n  The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.\n  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.\n\n                          ____________________"]], "columns": ["granule_id", "date", "congress", "session", "volume", "issue", "title", "chamber", "granule_class", "sub_granule_class", "page_start", "page_end", "speakers", "bills", "citation", "full_text"], "primary_keys": ["granule_id"], "primary_key_values": ["CREC-2025-07-02-pt1-PgH3039-8"], "units": {}, "query_ms": 3.2261409796774387, "source": "Federal Register API & Regulations.gov API", "source_url": "https://www.federalregister.gov/developers/api/v1", "license": "Public Domain (U.S. Government data)", "license_url": "https://www.regulations.gov/faq"}