home / openregs / congressional_record

congressional_record: CREC-2025-01-16-pt1-PgS222

Congressional Record — full text of everything said on the floor of Congress. Speeches, debates, procedural actions from 1994 to present. House, Senate, Extensions of Remarks, and Daily Digest.

Data license: Public Domain (U.S. Government data) · Data source: Federal Register API & Regulations.gov API

This data as json

granule_id date congress session volume issue title chamber granule_class sub_granule_class page_start page_end speakers bills citation full_text
CREC-2025-01-16-pt1-PgS222 2025-01-16 119 1     LAKEN RILEY ACT SENATE SENATE ALLOTHER S222 S222 [{"name": "Chris Van Hollen", "role": "speaking"}] [{"congress": "119", "type": "S", "number": "5"}, {"congress": "119", "type": "S", "number": "5"}] 171 Cong. Rec. S222 Congressional Record, Volume 171 Issue 9 (Thursday, January 16, 2025) [Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 9 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)] [Senate] [Page S222] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] LAKEN RILEY ACT Mr. VAN HOLLEN. Mr. President, I appreciate that we are beginning an amendment process on S. 5 in the Senate. I hope we continue with that process, as there are still significant improvements to be made to this bill. We must keep our communities safe and prioritize detention of violent offenders, and our focus must be on the most effective path to achieve that goal. I have introduced, along with Senator Kaine, an amendment that directly addresses the circumstances that led to the tragic murder of Laken Riley without creating a system that diverts resources away from the detention and deportation of violent offenders. I have also offered an amendment that makes clear that the apprehension and deportation of convicted violent offenders should be our highest enforcement priority. Yesterday, I voted against the Cornyn amendment, which would expand the category of offenses under which individuals are detained following an arrest only, not a conviction or even an indictment. While I appreciate the seriousness of those crimes, this would continue to take resources from detention and deportation of those who pose the greatest threat to our communities and who are actually convicted. I also voted for an amendment proposed by Senator Coons that would strike the section of the underlying bill that allows States attorneys general to sue the Federal Government when they disagree with any of the thousands of complex immigration enforcement decisions ICE and CBP make every day. Conflicting lawsuits in State courts around the country would paralyze our immigration enforcement system, ultimately jeopardizing public safety. I am disappointed that this amendment failed to pass. I urge my colleagues to work in a bipartisan way to improve this bill to keep our communities safe while ensuring that our immigration enforcement officials can focus on the greatest public safety risks. ____________________

Links from other tables

  • 1 row from granule_id in crec_speakers
  • 1 row from granule_id in crec_bills
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 1.307ms · Data license: Public Domain (U.S. Government data) · Data source: Federal Register API & Regulations.gov API