congressional_record: CREC-2012-12-31-pt1-PgE2025-2
Data license: Public Domain (U.S. Government data) · Data source: Federal Register API & Regulations.gov API
This data as json
| granule_id | date | congress | session | volume | issue | title | chamber | granule_class | sub_granule_class | page_start | page_end | speakers | bills | citation | full_text |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CREC-2012-12-31-pt1-PgE2025-2 | 2012-12-31 | 112 | 2 | SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (SNAP) | HOUSE | EXTENSIONS | ALLOTHER | E2025 | E2026 | [{"name": "Mike Quigley", "role": "speaking"}] | 158 Cong. Rec. E2025 | Congressional Record, Volume 158 Issue 171 (Monday, December 31, 2012) [Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 171 (Monday, December 31, 2012)] [Extensions of Remarks] [Pages E2025-E2026] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (SNAP) ______ HON. MIKE QUIGLEY of illinois in the house of representatives Monday, December 31, 2012 Mr. QUIGLEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today because in the coming week, most of us will sit down to a holiday meal with our families, friends, and loved ones. And most of us will take this meal for granted. But for 46 million Americans who rely on nutrition assistance, this holiday meal is not a guarantee. The vast majority--more than 85 percent--of these 46 million Americans are living in households making less than $22,000 for a family of four. And of those 46 million, half are children, and three-quarters are households that include an elderly person, a disabled person, or children. For these millions of families, food is not a certainty, and they struggle each day to make ends meet. Sadly, due to the recession, an increasing number of Americans have lost their jobs and been forced to turn to the supplemental nutrition assistance program, or SNAP. As the number of unemployed Americans increased 94 percent between 2007 and 2011, SNAP increased as well, rising 70 percent to meet demand. At the food pantries in my district, pantry visits have increased between 8 and 30 percent from last year. While the economy is improving, the number of individuals in need of assistance is still elevated. Rather than cutting food assistance right now, we should be bolstering it. Unfortunately, some members of this body have targeted food assistance, arguing it should be cut to balance the budget and avert cuts to defense. The Ryan budget proposed cutting SNAP by $133 billion. A cut of this magnitude would cut almost 10 million people off from food aid, or would result in a benefit cut of $90 per month for a family of four. For a family with a net monthly income of $338--the average for most SNAP households--a $90 cut would be devastating. I agree with my colleagues on the other side of the aisle: We must reduce the deficit. [[Page E2026]] And that means raising revenues and implementing cuts. But both revenue increases and cuts must be strategic, not simple. The tax code should be simplified, tax expenditures should be scrutinized, and tax increases should be progressive. Similarly, spending reductions should be based on a reexamination of what we need to remain competitive in a global economy. For instance, we should continue to invest in education, job training, infrastructure, and yes food assistance to keep Americans successful and competitive. We should cut outdated spending on defense expenditures, such as our out-sized nuclear stockpile and permanent troops in Europe. We should also reform our entitlements, such as Medicare, by paying providers for outcomes and quality, combating waste and fraud, and demanding higher rebates from drug companies. The truth is, food assistance comprises just two percent of the federal budget. And contrary to the claims by the some that food assistance is unsustainable--SNAP is expected to drop from .52 percent of GDP in 2011 to just .3 percent as the economy recovers. This is hardly an unsustainable trend. In fact, according to Moody's Analytics every $1 dollar invested in SNAP yields $1.72 in economic benefit. As we speak, negotiators are sitting down to determine what a final deficit reduction package will look like. I hope that as they debate the final deal, and look forward to spending the holidays indulging with their families, they remember the millions of families that aren't as lucky. I hope they remember the millions of children, parents, elderly, and disabled Americans who rely on SNAP to avoid going hungry. I recently had the privilege of volunteering at the Greater Chicago Food Depository, which provides food to over half a million Chicagoans every year. I met some of the folks who rely on SNAP and I heard their stories. And I can tell you, they are not takers. They are our friends and neighbors who have fallen on hard times and need our help. I won't soon forget them, and I hope those crafting the deficit reduction package won't either. |