home / openregs / congressional_record

congressional_record: CREC-2000-12-15-pt1-PgE2189-3

Congressional Record — full text of everything said on the floor of Congress. Speeches, debates, procedural actions from 1994 to present. House, Senate, Extensions of Remarks, and Daily Digest.

Data license: Public Domain (U.S. Government data) · Data source: Federal Register API & Regulations.gov API

This data as json

granule_id date congress session volume issue title chamber granule_class sub_granule_class page_start page_end speakers bills citation full_text
CREC-2000-12-15-pt1-PgE2189-3 2000-12-15 106 2     OSHA ERGO-NONSENSE HOUSE EXTENSIONS ALLOTHER E2189 E2189 [{"name": "Doug Bereuter", "role": "speaking"}]   146 Cong. Rec. E2189 Congressional Record, Volume 146 Issue 155 (Friday, December 15, 2000) [Congressional Record Volume 146, Number 155 (Friday, December 15, 2000)] [Extensions of Remarks] [Page E2189] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] OSHA ERGO-NONSENSE ______ HON. DOUG BEREUTER of nebraska in the house of representatives Friday, December 15, 2000 Mr. BEREUTER. Mr. Speaker, this Member highly commends this December 14, 2000, editorial from the Norfolk Daily News expressing strong concern regarding the new Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulation on ergonomics. Ergo-nonsense New OSHA workplace regulation isn't based on a completed study The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration calls its new regulation the ``Ergonomics Program Standard.'' The National Federation of Independent Businesses has a different description: ``Ergo-nonsense.'' ``Scheduled to take effect on Jan. 16, 2001, it is, without question, the most burdensome, expensive and intrusive regulation ever to be imposed on the small-business community,'' said Jack Faris, federation president. We would have to agree. Ostensibly designed to help prevent repetitive motion injuries, like carpal tunnel syndrome, the new regulation will require employers to alter the workplace in order to do so. It's a noble intent. But the regulation assumes that employers aren't already doing everything possible to take care of the health and well-being of employees. The regulation also doesn't have a scientific basis, seeing as how the National Academy of Science's study on ergonomics isn't even completed yet. It's also curious how this 1,688-page regulation was able to be introduced and published in about a year's time, when, on average, it takes OSHA four years to do so with other regulations. Because President Clinton allowed the regulation to move forward, it now will take legal action to stop it. That's not a sure thing, so business owners everywhere had better start preparing for their own version of ``ergo-nonsense.'' ____________________

Links from other tables

  • 1 row from granule_id in crec_speakers
  • 0 rows from granule_id in crec_bills
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 4.694ms · Data license: Public Domain (U.S. Government data) · Data source: Federal Register API & Regulations.gov API