home / openregs

cfr_sections

Current Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) — the actual text of federal regulations in force. Covers 19 CFR titles with 123,000+ regulatory sections and full-text search.

Data license: Public Domain (U.S. Government data) · Data source: Federal Register API & Regulations.gov API

22 rows where agency = "OSHA" and part_number = 1990 sorted by section_id

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: amendment_citations

title_number 1

  • 29 22

part_number 1

  • 1990 · 22 ✖

agency 1

  • OSHA · 22 ✖
section_id ▼ title_number title_name chapter subchapter part_number part_name subpart subpart_name section_number section_heading agency authority source_citation amendment_citations full_text
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.30.1 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.101 Scope. OSHA       This part establishes criteria and procedures for the identification, classification, and regulation of potential occupational carcinogens found in each workplace in the United States regulated by the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (the Act). The procedures contained in this part supplement the procedural regulations in other parts of this chapter. In the event of a conflict, the procedures contained in this part shall govern the identification, classification, and regulation of potential occupational carcinogens. This part may be referred to as “The OSHA Cancer Policy.”
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.30.2 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.102 Purpose. OSHA       The Act provides, among other things, that the Secretary, in promulgating standards dealing with toxic materials or harmful physical agents under this section, shall set the standard which most adequately assures, to the extent feasible, on the basis of the best available evidence, that no employee will suffer material impairment of health or functional capacity even if such employee has regular exposure to the hazard dealt with by such standard for the period of his or her working life. Development of standards under this section shall be based upon research, demonstrations, experiments, and such other information as may be appropriate. In addition to the attainment of the highest degree of health and safety protection for the employee, other considerations shall be the latest available scientific data in the field, the feasibility of the standards, and experience gained under this and other health and safety laws. Whenever practicable, the standard promulgated shall be expressed in terms of objective criteria and of the performance desired (section 6(b)(5)). the Secretary, in promulgating standards dealing with toxic materials or harmful physical agents under this section, shall set the standard which most adequately assures, to the extent feasible, on the basis of the best available evidence, that no employee will suffer material impairment of health or functional capacity even if such employee has regular exposure to the hazard dealt with by such standard for the period of his or her working life. Development of standards under this section shall be based upon research, demonstrations, experiments, and such other information as may be appropriate. In addition to the attainment of the highest degree of health and safety protection for the employee, other considerations shall be the latest available scientific data in the field, the feasibility of the standards, and experience gained under this and other health and safety laws. Whenever practicable, the standard promulgated shall be expressed in terms of obje…
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.30.3 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.103 Definitions. OSHA       Terms used in this part shall have the meanings set forth in the Act. In addition, as used in this part, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below: Act means the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91-596, 84 Stat. 1590 et seq., 29 U.S.C. 551 et seq.). Administrator of EPA means the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, or designee. Chairperson of CPSC means the Chairman of the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission, or designee. Commissioner of FDA means the Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, or designee. Director of NCI means the Director of the National Cancer Institute, United States Department of Health and Human Services, or designee. Director of NIEHS means the Director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, United States Department of Health and Human Services, or designee. Director of NIOSH means the Director of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, United States Department of Health and Human Services, or designee. Mutagenesis means the induction of heritable changes in the genetic material of either somatic or germinal cells. Positive results in short-term tests means positive results in assays for two or more of the following types of effect: (1) The induction of DNA damage and/or repair; (2) Mutagenesis in bacteria, yeast, Neurospora or Drosophila melanogaster; (3) Mutagenesis in mammalian somatic cells; (4) Mutagenesis in mammalian germinal cells; or (5) Neoplastic transformation of mammalian cells in culture. Potential occupational carcinogen means any substance, or combination or mixture of substances, which causes an increased incidence of benign and/or malignant neoplasms, or a substantial decrease in the latency period between exposure and onset of neoplasms in humans or in one or more experimental mammalian species as the result of any oral, respiratory or dermal exposure, or any …
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.30.4 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.104 Scientific review panel. OSHA       (a) General. At any time, the Secretary may request the Director of NCI, the Director of NIEHS and/or the Director of NIOSH to convene a scientific review panel (“the panel”) to provide recommendations to the Secretary in the identification, classification, or regulation of any potential occupational carcinogen. (b) Membership. The panel will consist of individuals chosen by the respective Director(s). The panel will consist of individuals who are appropriately qualified in the disciplines relevant to the issues to be considered, and who are employed by the United States. The panel does not constitute an advisory committee within the meaning of section 6(b) or 7(b) of the Act, or the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770). (c) Report. The Secretary shall request that the panel submit a report of its evaluation within ninety (90) days after the appointment of the members of the panel. The Secretary shall place a copy of the report in the record of any relevant rulemaking undertaken pursuant to this part and allow an appropriate time for public review and comment. If a panel is not established or fails to file a timely report, or if the Secretary determines that it is necessary to proceed without waiting for the panel's report, the Secretary may proceed in making any determination without such report. (d) Other aid and assistance. Nothing herein precludes the Secretary from obtaining advice or other aid from any person or organization including NCI, NIEHS, and NIOSH.
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.30.5 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.105 Advisory committees. OSHA       The Secretary may appoint an Advisory Committee, pursuant to sections 6(b) and 7 of the Act, and 29 CFR part 1912, concerning any potential occupational carcinogen. The Secretary shall require the Advisory Committee to submit its recommendations to assist the Secretary in standard setting no later than ninety (90) days from the date of the Advisory Committee's appointment, unless extended by the Secretary for exceptional circumstances. If an Advisory Committee fails to file a timely report, the Secretary may proceed in standard setting activities without such a report.
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.30.6 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.106 Amendments to this policy. OSHA     [45 FR 5282, Jan. 22, 1980; 45 FR 43405, June 27, 1980] (a) Initiation of review of this policy —(1) Secretary's request. No later than every three (3) years from the effective date of this part, or from the last general review, the Secretary shall request the Director of NCI, the Director of NIEHS and/or the Director of NIOSH, to review this part and render their opinions on whether significant scientific or technical advances made since the effective date of this part warrant any amendment to this part. The request shall ask that the answer be provided to the Secretary within one hundred twenty (120) days. (2) Recommendations by the institutes. At any time, the Director of NCI, the Director of NIEHS and/or the Director of NIOSH may submit recommendations to the Secretary for amendments to this part whenever any of them believes that scientific or technical advances justify such amendments. (3) Petitions from the public. (i) Any interested person may petition the Secretary concerning amendments to this part based upon substantial new issues or substantial new evidence. (ii) For the purposes of this part, substantial new evidence is evidence which differs significantly from that presented in establishing this part, including amendments. (iii) For the purposes of this part, substantial new issues are issues which differ significantly from those upon which the Secretary has reached a conclusion in the rulemaking establishing this part (including the conclusions reached in the preamble). (iv) Each petition to amend this part shall contain at least the following information: (A) Name and address of petitioner; (B) The provisions which the petitioner believes are inappropriate; (C) All data, views and arguments relied upon by the petitioner; and (D) A detailed statement and analysis as to why the petitioner believes that the data, views and arguments presented by petitioner: ( 1 ) Constitute substantial new issues or substantial new evidence; and ( 2 ) Are so significant as to warrant amendment of this part. (b) Response to recommendations and petitions…
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.31.7 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.111 General statement of regulatory policy. OSHA     [45 FR 5282, Jan. 22, 1980, as amended at 46 FR 5881, Jan. 21, 1981] (a) This part establishes the criteria and procedures under which substances will be regulated by OSHA as potential occupational carcinogens. Although the conclusive identification of “carcinogens” is a complex matter “on the frontiers of science,” ( IUD v. Hodgson 499 F. 2d 467, 474 (D.C. Cir. 1974)), responsible health regulatory policy requires that criteria should be specified for the identification of substances which should be regulated as posing potential cancer risks to workers. (b) The criteria established by this part are based on an extensive review of scientific data and opinions. The part provides for amending these criteria in light of new scientific developments. Decisions as to whether any particular substance meets the criteria or not will be consistent with the policies and procedures established by this part and will be based upon scientific evaluation of the evidence on that substance. (c) This part applies to individual substances, groups of substances, or combinations or mixtures of substances which may be found in workplaces in the United States. In individual rulemaking proceedings under this part, the identity and range of substances and mixtures to be covered by the standard will be specified and the appropriateness of applying the available evidence to the range of substances and mixtures proposed for regulation will be subject to scientific and policy review. (d) Potential occupational carcinogens will be identified and classified on the basis of human epidemiological studies and/or experimental carcinogenesis bioassays in mammals. Positive results in short term tests will also be used as concordant evidence. (e) Potential occupational carcinogens will be classified and regulated in accordance with the policy. The scientific evidence as to whether individual substances meet these criteria will be considered in individual rulemakings. The issues which may be considered in these rulemakings will be limited as specified herein. (f) This policy provides for the classification of po…
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.31.8 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.112 Classification of potential carcinogens. OSHA       The following criteria for identification, classification and regulation of potential occupational carcinogens will be applied, unless the Secretary considers evidence under the provisions of §§ 1990.143, 1990.144 and 1990.145 and determines that such evidence warrants an exception to these criteria. (a) Category I Potential Carcinogens. A substance shall be identified, classified, and regulated as a Category I Potential Carcinogen if, upon scientific evaluation, the Secretary determines that the substance meets the definition of a potential occupational carcinogen in (1) humans, or (2) in a single mammalian species in a long-term bioassay where the results are in concordance with some other scientifically evaluated evidence of a potential carcinogenic hazard, or (3) in a single mammalian species in an adequately conducted long-term bioassay, in appropriate circumstances where the Secretary determines the requirement for concordance is not necessary. Evidence of concordance is any of the following: positive results from independent testing in the same or other species, positive results in short-term tests, or induction of tumors at injection or implantation sites. (b) Category II Potential Carcinogens. A substance shall be identified, classified, and regulated as a Category II Potential Carcinogen if, upon scientific evaluation, the Secretary determines that: (1) The substance meets the criteria set forth in § 1990.112(a), but the evidence is found by the Secretary to be only “suggestive”; or (2) The substance meets the criteria set forth in § 1990.112(a) in a single mammalian species without evidence of concordance.
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.32.10 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.122 Response to petitions. OSHA       Whenever the Secretary receives any information submitted in writing by any interested person concerning the inclusion or omission of any substance from the Candidate List, the Secretary shall briefly review the information and any other available data, as defined in § 1990.121(a). The results of the Secretary's review shall be transmitted to the petitioner, together with a short statement of the Secretary's reasons therefor, and made public upon request.
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.32.11 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.131 Priority lists for regulating potential occupational carcinogens. OSHA       The Secretary shall establish two priority lists for regulating potential occupational carcinogens. One list should include approximately ten (10) candidates for rulemaking as Category I Potential Carcinogens; the other approximately ten (10) candidates for rulemaking as Category II Potential Carcinogens. The order of placement of substances on these lists will not reflect the Secretary's determination of the exact order in which these substances should be regulated in rulemaking proceedings but rather a policy determination that the Secretary plans to address some or all of these substances prior to proceeding with a thorough scientific review of data concerning other substances on the Candidate List. The inclusion or exclusion of any substance on these lists shall not be subject to judicial review or be the basis for any legal action. The Secretary may regulate a potential occupational carcinogen which has not been placed on these lists. The inclusion of a substance on either of these lists does not reflect a final scientific determination that the substance is, in fact, a Category I Potential Carcinogen or a Category II Potential Carcinogen.
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.32.12 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.132 Factors to be considered. OSHA       (a) The setting of priorities is a complex matter which requires subjective and policy judgments. It is not appropriate to establish a rigid formula or to assign predetermined weight to each factor. The identification of some of the elements is to guide the OSHA staff and inform the public on the development of priorities. It is not intended to create any legal rights with respect to the setting of priorities. (b) Some factors which may be taken into account in setting priorities for regulating potential occupational carcinogens, when such data are available, are: (1) The estimated number of workers exposed; (2) The estimated levels of human exposure; (3) The levels of exposure to the substance which have been reported to cause an increased incidence of neoplasms in exposed humans, animals or both; (4) The extent to which regulatory action could reduce not only risks of contracting cancer but also other occupational and environmental health hazards; (5) Whether the molecular structure of the substance is similar to the molecular structure of another substance which meets the definition of a potential occupational carcinogen; (6) Whether there are substitutes that pose a lower risk of cancer or other serious human health problems, or available evidence otherwise suggests that the social and economic costs of regulation would be small; and (7) OSHA will also consider its responsibilities for dealing with other health and safety hazards and will consider the actions being taken or planned by other governmental agencies in dealing with the same or similar health and safety hazards.
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.32.13 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.133 Publication. OSHA       (a) The Secretary shall publish the Candidate List in the Federal Register at least annually. (b) The Secretary shall publish the Priority Lists in the Federal Register at least every six months and may seek public comment thereon. (c) The Secretary may periodically publish in the Federal Register a notice requesting information concerning the classification and establishment of priorities for substances on the Candidate List together with a brief statement describing the type of information being sought.
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.32.9 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.121 Candidate list of potential occupational carcinogens. OSHA       (a) Contents. The Secretary shall prepare a list of substances (the “Candidate List”) which are reported to be present in any American workplace and which, on the basis of a brief scientific review of available data, may be considered candidates for further scientific review and possible regulation as Category I Potential Carcinogens or Category II Potential Carcinogens. For the purposes of this paragraph, “available data” means: (1) The data submitted by any person; (2) Any data referred to by the Secretary of HHS or by the Director of NIOSH, either in the latest list entitled “Suspected Carcinogens” or any other communication; (3) Literature referred to in U.S. Public Health Service, Publication No. 149; (4) Data summarized and reviewed in Monographs of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization; (5) The Toxic Substances Control Act Inventory of Chemical Substances, published by the Administrator of EPA; (6) The Secretary of HHS's Annual Report to the President and the Congress as required by the Community Mental Health Centers Extension Act of 1978, section 404(a)(9), 42 U.S.C. 285. (7) Any other relevant data of which the Secretary has actual knowledge. (b) Tentative classification. The Secretary may tentatively designate substances on the Candidate List as candidates for classification as Category I Potential Carcinogens or as Category II Potential Carcinogens, or may list substances without a tentative designation, based on the brief scientific review of available data for the purpose of initiating a more extensive scientific review. (c) No legal rights established. The inclusion or exclusion of any substance from the Candidate List shall not be subject to judicial review nor be the basis of any legal action, nor shall the exclusion of any substance from the list prevent the regulation of that substance as a potential occupational carcinogen. The inclusion of a substance on the Candidate List and its possible tentative designation as a Category I P…
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.33.14 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.141 Advance notice of proposed rulemaking. OSHA       (a) Within thirty (30) days after OSHA initiates a study concerning the economic and/or technological feasibility of specific standards that might be applied in the regulation of a potential occupational carcinogen, the Secretary will normally publish, in the Federal Register, a notice which includes at least the following: (1) The name of the substance(s), (2) The scope of the study, including where possible, (i) Affected industries, (ii) Levels of exposure being studied, (iii) The anticipated completion date of the study; (3) A brief summary of the available data on health effects; (4) An estimate of when the Secretary anticipates the issuance of a proposal; (5) An invitation to interested parties to provide relevant information; (6) A statement that persons wishing to provide OSHA with their own study should complete it within 30 days after the anticipated proposal date; and (7) A statement of the procedural requirements that must be met before substantial new issues or substantial new evidence will be considered in the proceeding pursuant to § 1990.145. (b) Where the Secretary determines to discontinue a feasibility study, the Secretary should publish, within 30 days, a notice in the Federal Register so indicating.
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.33.15 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.142 Initiation of a rulemaking. OSHA     [45 FR 5282, Jan. 22, 1980, as amended at 46 FR 5881, Jan. 21, 1981] Where the Secretary decides to regulate a potential occupational carcinogen, the Secretary shall initiate a rulemaking proceeding in accordance with one of the following procedures, as appropriate. (a) Notice of proposed rulemakings (section 6(b) of the Act) —(1) General. The Secretary may issue a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act and part 1911 of this chapter. The notice shall provide for no more than a sixty (60) day comment period, and may provide for a hearing, which shall be scheduled for no later than one hundred (100) days after publication of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. The commencement of the hearing may be postponed once, for no more than thirty (30) days, for good cause shown. (2) Provisions of the proposed standard for Category I Potential Carcinogens. Whenever the Secretary issues a notice of proposed rulemaking to regulate a substance as a Category I Potential Carcinogen: (i) The proposed standard shall contain at least provisions for scope and application, definitions, notification of use, a permissible exposure limit, monitoring, regulated areas, methods of compliance including the development of a compliance plan, respiratory protection, protective clothing and equipment, housekeeping, waste disposal, hygiene facilities, medical surveillance, employee information and training, signs and labels, recordkeeping, and employee observation of monitoring as set forth in § 1990.151, unless the Secretary explains why any or all such provisions are not appropriate; (ii) The model standard set forth in § 1990.151 shall be used as a guideline, and (iii) The permissible exposure limit shall be achieved primarily through engineering and work practice controls except that if a suitable substitute is available for one or more uses no occupational exposure shall be permitted for those uses. (3) Provisions of the proposed standard for Category II Potential Carcinogens. Whenever the Secretary issues a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to reg…
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.33.16 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.143 General provisions for the use of human and animal data. OSHA     [45 FR 5282, Jan. 22, 1980; 45 FR 43405, June 27, 1980] Human and animal data which are scientifically evaluated to be positive evidence for carcinogenicity including the following policies shall be uniformly relied upon for the identification of potential occupational carcinogens. Arguments challenging the following provisions or their application to specific substances will be considered in individual rulemaking proceedings only if the evidence presented in support of the arguments meets the criteria for consideration specified in § 1990.144 or § 1990.145. (a) Positive human studies. Positive results obtained in one or more human epidemiologic studies will be used to establish the qualitative inference of carcinogenic hazards to workers. (b) Positive animal studies. Positive results obtained in one or more experimental studies conducted in one or more mammalian species will be used to establish the qualitative inference of carcinogenic hazard to workers. Arguments that positive results obtained in mammalian species should not be relied upon will be considered only if evidence is presented which meets the criteria for consideration specified in § 1990.144(c) or 1990.144(f). (c) Non-positive human studies. Positive results in human or mammalian studies generally will be used for the qualitative identification of potential occupational carcinogens, even where non-positive results from human studies exist. Such non-positive results will be considered by the Secretary only if the studies or results meet the criteria set forth in § 1990.144(a). (d) Non-positive animal studies. Positive results in one or more mammalian studies will be used for the qualitative identification of potential occupational carcinogens, even where non-positive studies exist in other mammalian species. Where non-positive and positive results exist in studies in the same species, the non-positive results will be evaluated. (e) Spontaneous tumors. Positive results in human or mammalian studies for the induction or acceleration of induction of tumors of a type which occurs “spontaneousl…
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.33.17 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.144 Criteria for consideration of arguments on certain issues. OSHA     [45 FR 5282, Jan. 22, 1980, as amended at 46 FR 5881, Jan. 21, 1981] Arguments on the following issues will be considered by the Secretary in identifying or classifying any substance pursuant to this part, if evidence for the specific substance subject to the rulemaking conforms to the following criteria. Such arguments and evidence will be evaluated based upon scientific and policy judgments. (a) Non-positive results obtained in human epidemiologic studies. Non-positive results obtained in human epidemiologic studies regarding the substance subject to the rulemaking or to a similar or closely related substance will be considered by the Secretary only if they meet the following criteria: Criteria. (i) The epidemiologic study involved at least 20 years' exposure of a group of subjects to the substance and at least 30 years' observation of the subjects after initial exposure; (ii) Documented reasons are provided for predicting the site(s) at which the substance would induce cancer if it were carcinogenic in humans; and (iii) The group of exposed subjects was large enough for an increase in cancer incidence of 50% above that in unexposed controls to have been detected at any of the predicted sites. Criteria. (i) The epidemiologic study involved at least 20 years' exposure of a group of subjects to the substance and at least 30 years' observation of the subjects after initial exposure; (ii) Documented reasons are provided for predicting the site(s) at which the substance would induce cancer if it were carcinogenic in humans; and (iii) The group of exposed subjects was large enough for an increase in cancer incidence of 50% above that in unexposed controls to have been detected at any of the predicted sites. Arguments that non-positive results obtained in human epidemiologic studies should be used to establish numerical upper limits on potential risks to humans exposed to specific levels of a substance will be considered only if criteria (i) and (ii) are met and, in addition: (iv) Specific data on the level of exposure of the group of workers are provided, based either…
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.33.18 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.145 Consideration of substantial new issues or substantial new evidence. OSHA       (a) Substantial new issues. Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the Secretary will consider in a rulemaking proceeding on a specific substance any substantial new issues upon which the Secretary did not reach a conclusion in the rulemaking proceeding(s) underlying this part including conclusions presented in the preamble. (b) Substantial new evidence. Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the Secretary will consider in a rulemaking proceeding on a specific substance any arguments, data or views which he determines are based upon substantial new evidence which may warrant the amendment of one or more provisions of this part. For the purposes of this part, “substantial new evidence” is evidence directly relevant to any provision of this part and is based upon data, views or arguments which differ significantly from those presented in establishing this part, including amendments thereto. (c) Petitions for consideration of substantial new evidence —(1) Petition. Any interested person may file a written petition with the Secretary to consider “substantial new evidence” or one or more “substantial new issues” which contains the information specified in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. The Secretary shall treat such a petition as a request to amend this part, as well as a petition to consider “substantial new evidence”. (2) Contents. Each petition for consideration of “substantial new evidence” or one or more “substantial new issues” shall contain at least the following information: (i) Name and address of the petitioner; (ii) All of the data, views and arguments that the petitioner would like the Secretary to consider; (iii) The provision or provisions that petitioner believes are inappropriate or should be added to this part in light of the new data, views, and arguments; (iv) A statement which demonstrates that the data, views, and arguments relied upon by petitioners are directly relevant to the substance or class of substances that is the subject of a rulemaking or an Adva…
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.33.19 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.146 Issues to be considered in the rulemaking. OSHA     [45 FR 5282, Jan. 22, 1980, as amended at 46 FR 5881, Jan. 21, 1981] Except as provided in § 1990.145, after issuance of the advance notice of rulemaking, the proceedings for individual substances under this part shall be limited to consideration of the following issues: (a) Whether the substance, group of substances or combination of substances subject to the proposed rulemaking is appropriately considered in a single proceeding; (b) Whether the substance or group of substances subject to the rulemaking meets the definition of a potential occupational carcinogen set forth in § 1990.103, including whether the scientific studies are reliable; (c) Whether the available data can appropriately be applied to the substance, group of substances or combination of substances covered by the rulemaking; (d) Whether information, data, and views that are submitted in accordance with § 1990.144 are sufficient to warrant an exception to this part; (e) Whether the data, views and arguments that are submitted in accordance with § 1990.145 are sufficient to warrant amendment of this part; (f) Whether the potential occupational carcinogen meets the criteria for a Category I Potential Carcinogen or a Category II Potential Carcinogen. (g) The environmental impact arising from regulation of the substance; (h) Any issues required by statute or executive order; (i) The determination of the level to control exposures to Category I Potential Carcinogens primarily through the use of engineering and work practice controls including technological and economic considerations. (j) The determination of the appropriate employee exposure level, consistent with the Act's requirements, for Category II Potential Carcinogens; (k) Whether suitable substitutes are available for one or more uses of Category I Potential Carcinogens and; if so, the no occupational exposure level to be achieved solely with engineering and work practice controls and other issues relevant to substitution; and (l) Whether the provisions of the proposal and of §§ 1990.151 and 1990.152 (model standards) are appropriate, except as lim…
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.33.20 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.147 Final action. OSHA       (a) Within one hundred twenty (120) days from the last day of any hearing or ninety (90) days from the close of any post hearing comment period, whichever occurs first, the Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register: (1) A final standard based upon the record in the proceeding; or (2) A statement that no final standard will be issued, and the reasons therefor, or (3) A statement that the Secretary intends to issue a final rule, but that he is unable to do so at the present time, including: (i) The reasons therefor; and (ii) The date by which the standard will be published, which may not exceed one hundred twenty (120) days thereafter. (iii) The Secretary may issue no more than one such notice, unless the Secretary determines that (A) new evidence which was unavailable during the rulemaking proceeding has just become available; (B) the evidence is so important that a final rule could not reasonably be issued without this evidence, and; (C) the record is reopened for receipt of comments and/or a hearing on this evidence. This paragraph does not require the Secretary to consider any evidence which is submitted after the dates established for the submission of evidence. (b) The failure of the Secretary to comply with the required timeframes shall not be a basis to set aside any standard or to require the issuance of a new proposal on any individual substance. (c) The final standard shall state whether the substance or group of substances subject to the rulemaking is classified as a Category I Potential Carcinogen or as a Category II Potential Carcinogen. If the classification differs from that in the notice of proposed rulemaking, the Secretary shall explain the reasons for the change in classification in the preamble to the final standard. (d) If the substance is classified as a Category I Potential Carcinogen, the final standard shall conform to the provisions of § 1990.142(a)(2)(iii). If the final standard contains other provisions that substantially differ from the proposed provisions, the Secretar…
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.34.21 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.151 Model standard pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act. OSHA     [45 FR 5282, Jan. 22, 1980; 45 FR 43405, 43406, June 27, 1980, as amended at 46 FR 5881, Jan. 21, 1981] Occupational Exposure to ________ Permanent Standard (insert section number of standard) (a) Scope and application —(1) General. This section applies to all occupational exposures to ___ or to (specify those uses or classes of uses of ___ [Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number 0000] which are covered by the standard, including, where appropriate, the type of exposure to be regulated by the standard) except as provided in paragraph (a)(2). (2) Exemptions. This section does not apply to (insert those uses or classes of uses of ___ which are exempted from compliance with the standard, including, where appropriate, (i) Workplaces where exposure to ___ results from solid or liquid mixtures containing a specified percentage of ___ or less; (ii) Workplaces where another Federal agency is exercising statutory authority to prescribe or enforce standards or regulations affecting occupational exposure to ___ or (iii) Workplaces which are appropriately addressed in a separate standard). (b) Definitions. ___ means (definition of the substance, group of substances, or combination of substances, to be regulated ). Action level means an airborne concentration of ___ of (insert appropriate level of exposure). Where appropriate, consider an action level as a limitation on requirements for periodic monitoring (para. (e)(3)), medical surveillance (para. (n)), training (para. (o)), labels (para. (p)(3)), and other provisions. Assistant Secretary means the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Labor, or designee. Authorized person means any person specifically authorized by the employer whose duties require the person to enter regulated areas or any person entering such an area as a designated representative of employees for the purpose of exercising the opportunity to observe monitoring procedures under paragraph (r) of this section. Director means the Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Health, and Health Ser…
29:29:8.1.1.1.25.0.34.22 29 Labor XVII   1990 PART 1990—IDENTIFICATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND REGULATION OF POTENTIAL OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGENS       § 1990.152 Model emergency temporary standard pursuant to section 6(c) of the Act. OSHA     [45 FR 5282, Jan. 22, 1980; 45 FR 43406, 43407, June 27, 1980, as amended at 46 FR 5882, Jan. 21, 1981] Occupational Exposure to ______ Emergency Temporary Standard (insert section number of standard) (a) Scope and application —(1) General. This section applies to all occupational exposures to ______, or to (specify the uses of classes of uses of ______ [Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number 00000], which are covered by the standard, including, where appropriate, the type of exposure to be regulated by the standard) except as provided in paragraph (a)(2). (2) Exemption. This section does not apply to (insert those uses or classes of uses of ______ which are exempted from compliance with the standard, including, where appropriate, (i) Workplaces where exposure to ______ results from solid or liquid mixtures containing a specified percentage of ______ or less; (ii) Workplaces where another Federal agency is exercising statutory authority to prescribe or enforce standards or regulations affecting occupational exposure to ______ or (iii) Workplaces which are appropriately addressed in a separate standard. (b) Definitions. ______ means (definition of the substance, group of substances, or combination of substances, to be regulated). Action level means an airborne concentration of ______ of (insert appropriate level of exposure). Where appropriate, consider an action level as a limitation on requirements for periodic monitoring (para. (e)(3)), medical surveillance (para. (n)), training (para, (o)), and other provisions. Assistant Secretary means the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Labor, or designee. Authorized person means any person specifically authorized by the employer whose duties require the person to enter a regulated area or any person entering such an area as a designated representative of employees exercising the opportunity to observe monitoring procedures under paragraph (r) of this section. Director means the Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, or d…

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE cfr_sections (
    section_id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
    title_number INTEGER,
    title_name TEXT,
    chapter TEXT,
    subchapter TEXT,
    part_number TEXT,
    part_name TEXT,
    subpart TEXT,
    subpart_name TEXT,
    section_number TEXT,
    section_heading TEXT,
    agency TEXT,
    authority TEXT,
    source_citation TEXT,
    amendment_citations TEXT,
    full_text TEXT
);
CREATE INDEX idx_cfr_title ON cfr_sections(title_number);
CREATE INDEX idx_cfr_part ON cfr_sections(part_number);
CREATE INDEX idx_cfr_agency ON cfr_sections(agency);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 420.138ms · Data license: Public Domain (U.S. Government data) · Data source: Federal Register API & Regulations.gov API