lobbying_activities: 2019577
Data license: Public Domain (U.S. Government data) · Data source: Federal Register API & Regulations.gov API
This data as json
| id | filing_uuid | filing_type | registrant_name | registrant_id | client_name | filing_year | filing_period | issue_code | specific_issues | government_entities | income_amount | expense_amount | is_no_activity | is_termination | received_date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019577 | ff874a2f-66b8-4cd6-be1c-868fffe993d9 | 3T | INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE AND HUMAN VALUES, INC | 400908651 | INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE AND HUMAN VALUES, INC | 2017 | third_quarter | FIN | Re: Final Rule on Arbitration Agreements We write to state our strong support for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)s final rule to limit pre-dispute binding mandatory (or forced) arbitration clauses in consumer finance contracts. The rule, which will restore consumers ability to band together in court to pursue claims, is a significant step forward in the ongoing fight to curb predatory practices in consumer financial products and services and to make these markets fairer and safer. Lenders and other financial services companies use forced arbitration to push consumers out of court and into a private arbitration system that is tilted against them. Forced arbitration eliminates the right to a civil jury trial, limits discovery, restricts or prohibits public disclosure of proceedings and outcomes, and makes meaningful appeals virtually impossible. It also often prohibits consumers from banding together in a class action to hold the company responsible. | Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB),SENATE,State, Dept of (DOS) | 0 | 1 | 2017-10-04T08:49:31.467000-04:00 |