{"database": "lobbying", "table": "lobbying_activities", "is_view": false, "human_description_en": "where filing_uuid = \"5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd\" sorted by filing_year descending", "rows": [[800556, "5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd", "Q2", "NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE", 28481, "NATIONAL RIGHT LIFE COMMITTEE", 2009, "second_quarter", "HCR", "On Senator Max Baucuss Call to Action: Health Reform 2009 [commonly known as the Baucus  White Paper on Health Reform], opposed rationing of health care, supported the addition of variable  withhold financing method to avoid rationing.  (continued) On the Senate Health Education Labor and Pensions Chairmans Mark titled, Affordable Health  Choices Act, Opposed rationing of health care.  Supported the addition of variable withhold financing  method to avoid rationing.  Urged that the secretary be precluded from rejecting plans based on: their  having a fee-for service structure, or by imposing premium price controls, or by placing treatment limits.   Urged against the incentivizing the denial of treatments deemed to be cost-ineffective on quality of life  grounds.  Urged against reimbursement methods which give broad authority to the Secretary to prohibit  reimbursement to providers on safe treatments or procedures they wish to prescribe.  Urged the  support of  Sen. Enzi amendments, 7 and 8, which would prohibit use of comparative effectiveness  research to ration healthcare based on the governments assessment of whether elderly, disabled or  medically dependent individuals merit treatment by preventing treatment denial.  \n\nOn potential Finance Committee Health Care legislation, opposed rationing of health care.  Supported  the addition of variable withhold financing method to avoid rationing.  Urged that there be a prohibition  of any standard that discounts the value of a period of life based on the patients present or predicted  disability or quality of life. Urged that provisions be added to Comparative Effectiveness elements of  any bill that would ensure that patients competence, age, expected length of life, present or predicted  disability, degree of medical dependency, or quality of life not be used as the basis for denial of Medicare  benefits to patients against their wishes.  \n\nOn the Healthy Americans Act (S. 391), opposed rationing of health care, supported the addition of  variable withhold financing method to avoid rationing.  \n\nDiscussions generally on potential health care reform generally, opposed rationing of health care,  supported the addition of variable withhold financing method to avoid rationing.  \n\nOn the tri-committee House draft, H. R. __, titled To provide affordable, quality health care for all  Americans and reduce the growth in health care spending, and for other purposes,  opposed rationing  of health care.  Supported the addition of variable withhold financing method to avoid rationing.  Urged  that the secretary be precluded from rejecting plans based on: their having a fee-for service structure,  or by imposing premium price controls, or by placing treatment limits.    Urged that there be a  prohibition of any standard that discounts the value of a period of life based on the patients present or  predicted disability or quality of life.  Urged the removal of elements that incentivize denial of treatment.    Urged against the incentivizing the denial of treatments deemed to be cost-ineffective on quality of life  grounds.  Urged against reimbursement methods which give broad authority to the Secretary to prohibit  reimbursement to providers on safe treatments or procedures they wish to prescribe.  Urged that  provisions be added to Comparative Effectiveness elements of any bill that would ensure that patients  competence, age, expected length of life, present or predicted disability, degree of medical dependency,  or quality of life not be used as the basis for denial of Medicare benefits to patients against their wishes.  \n\nDiscussion generally on potential Comparative Effectiveness elements of health reform bills, regarding  comparative effectiveness standards in Medicare, worked to ensure that patients competence, age,  expected length of life, present or predicted disability, degree of medical dependency, or quality of life  will not be used as the basis for denial of Medicare benefits to patients against their wishes.  \n\nOn Senate 1213, The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Act of 2009, regarding comparative  effectiveness standards in Medicare, worked to ensure that patients competence, age, expected length  of life, present or predicted disability, degree of medical dependency, or quality of life will not be used as  the basis for denial of Medicare benefits to patients against their wishes.  \n\nOn Senate 1133, Empowering Medicare Patient Choices Act,  supported the removal of language  which creates an unacceptable disincentive for balanced counseling and assistance that genuinely  attempts to elucidate patients values and preferences, and an incentive to steer them toward rejection  of treatment, including life-preserving treatment. Urged for the inclusion of representatives of disability  rights groups and groups who advocate for treatment without regard to patients quality of life.  (continued) On Senate 1263 Senior Navigation and Planning Act of 2009, supported the removal of language  which creates a disincentive for balanced counseling and assistance that genuinely attempts to elucidate  patients values and preferences, and an incentive to steer them toward rejection of treatment, including  life-preserving treatment. Urged for the inclusion of representatives of disability rights groups and  groups who advocate for treatment without regard to patients quality of life.  Urged for continuing  oversight and evaluation of created board. Urged for changes to provisions regarding portability of  advanced directives across states.  Urged for the inclusion of conscience protections.  \n\nOn Senate 1150 Advance Planning and Compassionate Care Act of 2009,   urged for a qualified   oversight body make recommendations concerning various informational elements of the legislation.   Strongly opposed provisions that would repeal provisions of the Assisted Suicide Funding Restriction  Act.  Sought the inclusion of protective language that would safeguard state modifications when the  state adopted the Uniformed Health Care Decisions Act.", "HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,SENATE", null, 158008, 0, 0, "2009-07-18T05:57:15-04:00"], [800557, "5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd", "Q2", "NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE", 28481, "NATIONAL RIGHT LIFE COMMITTEE", 2009, "second_quarter", "SCI", "Contacts in opposition to anticipated authorization legislation to allow or require federal funding of research that requires killing of human embryos and/or creation of human embryos by cloning, and urging continuation of Dickey-Wicker embryo-protection language on FY 2010 appropriations bill for Labor-HHS. (continued) Contacts in support of H.R. 877, Patients First Act, sponsored by Reps. Forbes and Lipinski (to promote federal funding of ethical forms of stem cell research), and H.R. 1050, the Human Cloning Prohibition Act, sponsored by Reps. Bart Stupak and Zach Wamp, to prohibit the creation of embryos of the species homo sapiens by cloning.\n\nContacts in opposition to H.R. 872 and H.R. 873, sponsored by Reps. DeGette and Castle, and S. 487, sponsored by Senators Harkin and Specter, bills to authorize federal funding of embryo-destructive research, including distribution of letter dated March 31, 2009.", "HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,SENATE", null, 158008, 0, 0, "2009-07-18T05:57:15-04:00"], [800558, "5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd", "Q2", "NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE", 28481, "NATIONAL RIGHT LIFE COMMITTEE", 2009, "second_quarter", "MMM", "On Senator Max Baucuss Call to Action: Health Reform 2009 [commonly known as the Baucus  White Paper on Health Reform], opposed rationing of health care, supported the addition of variable  withhold financing method to avoid rationing.  (continued) On the Senate Health Education Labor and Pensions Chairmans Mark titled, Affordable Health  Choices Act, Opposed rationing of health care.  Supported the addition of variable withhold financing  method to avoid rationing.  Urged that the secretary be precluded from rejecting plans based on: their  having a fee-for service structure, or by imposing premium price controls, or by placing treatment limits.   Urged against the incentivizing the denial of treatments deemed to be cost-ineffective on quality of life  grounds.  Urged against reimbursement methods which give broad authority to the Secretary to prohibit  reimbursement to providers on safe treatments or procedures they wish to prescribe.  Urged the  support of  Sen. Enzi amendments, 7 and 8, which would prohibit use of comparative effectiveness  research to ration healthcare based on the governments assessment of whether elderly, disabled or  medically dependent individuals merit treatment by preventing treatment denial.  \n\nOn potential Finance Committee Health Care legislation, opposed rationing of health care.  Supported  the addition of variable withhold financing method to avoid rationing.  Urged that there be a prohibition  of any standard that discounts the value of a period of life based on the patients present or predicted  disability or quality of life. Urged that provisions be added to Comparative Effectiveness elements of  any bill that would ensure that patients competence, age, expected length of life, present or predicted  disability, degree of medical dependency, or quality of life not be used as the basis for denial of Medicare  benefits to patients against their wishes.   \n\nOn the Healthy Americans Act (S. 391), opposed rationing of health care, supported the addition of  variable withhold financing method to avoid rationing.  \n\nDiscussions generally on potential health care reform generally, opposed rationing of health care,  supported the addition of variable withhold financing method to avoid rationing.  \n\nOn the tri-committee House draft, H. R. __, titled To provide affordable, quality health care for all  Americans and reduce the growth in health care spending, and for other purposes,  opposed rationing  of health care.  Supported the addition of variable withhold financing method to avoid rationing.  Urged  that the secretary be precluded from rejecting plans based on: their having a fee-for service structure,  or by imposing premium price controls, or by placing treatment limits.    Urged that there be a  prohibition of any standard that discounts the value of a period of life based on the patients present or  predicted disability or quality of life.  Urged the removal of elements that incentivize denial of treatment.    Urged against the incentivizing the denial of treatments deemed to be cost-ineffective on quality of life  grounds.  Urged against reimbursement methods which give broad authority to the Secretary to prohibit  reimbursement to providers on safe treatments or procedures they wish to prescribe.  Urged that  provisions be added to Comparative Effectiveness elements of any bill that would ensure that patients  competence, age, expected length of life, present or predicted disability, degree of medical dependency,  or quality of life not be used as the basis for denial of Medicare benefits to patients against their wishes.  \n\nDiscussion generally on potential Comparative Effectiveness elements of health reform bills, regarding  comparative effectiveness standards in Medicare, worked to ensure that patients competence, age,  expected length of life, present or predicted disability, degree of medical dependency, or quality of life  will not be used as the basis for denial of Medicare benefits to patients against their wishes.  \n\nOn Senate 1213, The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Act of 2009, regarding comparative  effectiveness standards in Medicare, worked to ensure that patients competence, age, expected length  of life, present or predicted disability, degree of medical dependency, or quality of life will not be used as  the basis for denial of Medicare benefits to patients against their wishes.  \n\nOn Senate 1133, Empowering Medicare Patient Choices Act,  supported the removal of language  which creates an disincentive for balanced counseling and assistance that genuinely attempts to elucidate  patients values and preferences, and an incentive to steer them toward rejection of treatment, including  life-preserving treatment. Urged for the inclusion of representatives of disability rights groups and  groups who advocate for treatment without regard to patients quality of life.  \n\n(continued) On Senate 1263 Senior Navigation and Planning Act of 2009, supported the removal of language  which creates a disincentive for balanced counseling and assistance that genuinely attempts to elucidate  patients values and preferences, and an incentive to steer them toward rejection of treatment, including  life-preserving treatment. Urged for the inclusion of representatives of disability rights groups and  groups who advocate for treatment without regard to patients quality of life.  Urged for continuing  oversight and evaluation of created board. Urged for changes to provisions regarding portability of  advanced directives across states.  Urged for the inclusion of conscience protections.  \n\nOn Senate 1150 Advance Planning and Compassionate Care Act of 2009,   urged for a qualified  oversight body to make recommendations concerning various informational elements of the legislation.   Strongly opposed provisions that would repeal provisions of the Assisted Suicide Funding Restriction  Act.  Sought the inclusion of protective language that would safeguard state modifications when a state  had adopted the Uniformed Health Care Decisions Act.", "HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,SENATE", null, 158008, 0, 0, "2009-07-18T05:57:15-04:00"], [800559, "5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd", "Q2", "NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE", 28481, "NATIONAL RIGHT LIFE COMMITTEE", 2009, "second_quarter", "COM", "Contacts in support of S. 34 and H.R. 226, Broadcaster Freedom Act, to prevent reimposition of the so-called Fairness Doctrine.", "HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,SENATE", null, 158008, 0, 0, "2009-07-18T05:57:15-04:00"], [800560, "5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd", "Q2", "NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE", 28481, "NATIONAL RIGHT LIFE COMMITTEE", 2009, "second_quarter", "CIV", "Response to inquiries regarding possible amendments to \"hate crimes\" legislation (H.R. 1913); no formal position taken on any amendments offered in the House.", "HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,SENATE", null, 158008, 0, 0, "2009-07-18T05:57:15-04:00"], [800561, "5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd", "Q2", "NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE", 28481, "NATIONAL RIGHT LIFE COMMITTEE", 2009, "second_quarter", "FOR", "Contacts in support of Chris Smith amendment to Foreign Relations Authorization Act (H.R. 2410), to prevent attacks on foreign abortion laws by the State Department Office for Global Women's Issues, and in opposition to the bill after the Rules Committee refused to make the amendment in order (see letters to the House dated June 5 and June 9, 2009).  Contacts to Senate in opposition to ratification of CEDAW and to House in opposition to H.Res. 22, a pro-CEDAW resolution.  (continued) Contacts in support of H.R. 1967, sponsored by Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner, to prohibit funding of organizations that support or participate in the management of programs that include coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.\n\nContacts to House expressing general concerns about abortion-related issues that may arise during anticipated reauthorization/rewrite of the Foreign Assistance Act.", "HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,SENATE", null, 158008, 0, 0, "2009-07-18T05:57:15-04:00"], [800562, "5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd", "Q2", "NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE", 28481, "NATIONAL RIGHT LIFE COMMITTEE", 2009, "second_quarter", "BUD", "Contacts to House and Senate offices in support of continuation of traditional prolife provisions in appropriations bills for fiscal year 2010, including Hyde Amendment to HHS appropriations bill, prohibition on use of appropriated funds for abortions in Financial Services appropriations bill (H.R. 3170), and the prohibition on abortion-related litigation by Legal Services Corporation in Commerce-Justice appropriations bill (H.R. 2847).", "HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,SENATE", null, 158008, 0, 0, "2009-07-18T05:57:15-04:00"], [800563, "5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd", "Q2", "NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE", 28481, "NATIONAL RIGHT LIFE COMMITTEE", 2009, "second_quarter", "FAM", "Contacts with House and Senate in opposition to the \"Freedom of Choice Act\" (FOCA), a bill to invalidate virtually all state and federal laws and policies that in any way limit access to abortion, the reintroduction of which is anticipated sometime during the 111th Congress.  (continued) Contacts to House in support of Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act (CIANA) (H.R. 634) and the Child Custody Protection Act (unnumbered).\n\nContacts in support of S. 85 and H.R. 614, legislation to exclude certain abortion providers from funding under Title X of the Public Health Service Act. \n\nContacts in support of H.R. 636, the Positive Alternatives Act, sponsored by Rep. Michele Bachmann.\n\nContacts generally supportive of certain titles of S. 270 and H.R. 605, Pregnant Women and Family Support Act, while not taking a position on the overall omnibus legislation at this time.  Contacts expressing objections to certain components of S. 21 and H.R. 463.  \n\nContacts in support of H.R. 649, the Ultrasound Informed Consent Act; H.R. 213, the Adoption Tax Relief Guarantee Act; and H.R. 195, the Informed Choice Act (aid for ultrasound machines for certain centers).\n\nConsultations regarding legislation to protect conscience rights of health-care providers with respect to abortion, and contacts in support of Coburn Amendment No. 828 to the Senate budget resolution, S. Con. Res. 13.", "HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,SENATE", null, 158008, 0, 0, "2009-07-18T05:57:15-04:00"], [800564, "5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd", "Q2", "NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE", 28481, "NATIONAL RIGHT LIFE COMMITTEE", 2009, "second_quarter", "INS", "Contacts in support of exclusion of abortion mandates and abortion subsidies from all health care reform legislation currently under development.  Contacts in opposition to \"Tri-Committee bill\" draft released in House in June, 2009, and draft bill proposed by Senator Kennedy and referred to HELP Committee (unnumbered).  Contacts encouraging certain House members to sign a letter originated by Rep. Dan Boren to Speaker Pelosi urging exclusion of abortion from \"health care reform\" legislation.", "HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,SENATE", null, 158008, 0, 0, "2009-07-18T05:57:15-04:00"], [800565, "5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd", "Q2", "NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE", 28481, "NATIONAL RIGHT LIFE COMMITTEE", 2009, "second_quarter", "GOV", "Contacts in opposition to confirmation of Dawn Johnsen as assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel.  Contacts raising questions regarding whether Judge Sonia Sotomayor, nominated to a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court, would respect the text and history of the Constitution, and refrain from overturning legislative enactments that are not inconsistent with that text and history.", "HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,SENATE", null, 158008, 0, 0, "2009-07-18T05:57:15-04:00"], [800566, "5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd", "Q2", "NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE", 28481, "NATIONAL RIGHT LIFE COMMITTEE", 2009, "second_quarter", "MED", "Contacts in opposition to anticipated authorization legislation to allow or require federal funding of research that requires killing of human embryos and/or creation of human embryos by cloning, and urging continuation of Dickey-Wicker embryo-protection language on FY 2010 appropriations bill for Labor-HHS. (continued) Contacts in support of H.R. 877, Patients First Act, sponsored by Reps. Forbes and Lipinski (to promote federal funding of ethical forms of stem cell research), and H.R. 1050, the Human Cloning Prohibition Act, sponsored by Reps. Bart Stupak and Zach Wamp, to prohibit the creation of embryos of the species homo sapiens by cloning.\n\nContacts in opposition to H.R. 872 and H.R. 873, sponsored by Reps. DeGette and Castle, and S. 487, sponsored by Senators Harkin and Specter, bills to authorize federal funding of embryo-destructive research.", "HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,SENATE", null, 158008, 0, 0, "2009-07-18T05:57:15-04:00"]], "truncated": false, "filtered_table_rows_count": 11, "expanded_columns": [], "expandable_columns": [[{"column": "filing_uuid", "other_table": "lobbying_filings_raw", "other_column": "filing_uuid"}, "registrant_name"]], "columns": ["id", "filing_uuid", "filing_type", "registrant_name", "registrant_id", "client_name", "filing_year", "filing_period", "issue_code", "specific_issues", "government_entities", "income_amount", "expense_amount", "is_no_activity", "is_termination", "received_date"], "primary_keys": ["id"], "units": {}, "query": {"sql": "select id, filing_uuid, filing_type, registrant_name, registrant_id, client_name, filing_year, filing_period, issue_code, specific_issues, government_entities, income_amount, expense_amount, is_no_activity, is_termination, received_date from lobbying_activities where \"filing_uuid\" = :p0 order by filing_year desc limit 101", "params": {"p0": "5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd"}}, "facet_results": {"issue_code": {"name": "issue_code", "type": "column", "hideable": false, "toggle_url": "/lobbying/lobbying_activities.json?filing_uuid=5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd", "results": [{"value": "BUD", "label": "BUD", "count": 1, "toggle_url": "https://www.pawtectors.org/lobbying/lobbying_activities.json?filing_uuid=5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd&issue_code=BUD", "selected": false}, {"value": "CIV", "label": "CIV", "count": 1, "toggle_url": "https://www.pawtectors.org/lobbying/lobbying_activities.json?filing_uuid=5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd&issue_code=CIV", "selected": false}, {"value": "COM", "label": "COM", "count": 1, "toggle_url": "https://www.pawtectors.org/lobbying/lobbying_activities.json?filing_uuid=5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd&issue_code=COM", "selected": false}, {"value": "FAM", "label": "FAM", "count": 1, "toggle_url": "https://www.pawtectors.org/lobbying/lobbying_activities.json?filing_uuid=5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd&issue_code=FAM", "selected": false}, {"value": "FOR", "label": "FOR", "count": 1, "toggle_url": "https://www.pawtectors.org/lobbying/lobbying_activities.json?filing_uuid=5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd&issue_code=FOR", "selected": false}, {"value": "GOV", "label": "GOV", "count": 1, "toggle_url": "https://www.pawtectors.org/lobbying/lobbying_activities.json?filing_uuid=5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd&issue_code=GOV", "selected": false}, {"value": "HCR", "label": "HCR", "count": 1, "toggle_url": "https://www.pawtectors.org/lobbying/lobbying_activities.json?filing_uuid=5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd&issue_code=HCR", "selected": false}, {"value": "INS", "label": "INS", "count": 1, "toggle_url": "https://www.pawtectors.org/lobbying/lobbying_activities.json?filing_uuid=5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd&issue_code=INS", "selected": false}, {"value": "MED", "label": "MED", "count": 1, "toggle_url": "https://www.pawtectors.org/lobbying/lobbying_activities.json?filing_uuid=5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd&issue_code=MED", "selected": false}, {"value": "MMM", "label": "MMM", "count": 1, "toggle_url": "https://www.pawtectors.org/lobbying/lobbying_activities.json?filing_uuid=5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd&issue_code=MMM", "selected": false}, {"value": "SCI", "label": "SCI", "count": 1, "toggle_url": "https://www.pawtectors.org/lobbying/lobbying_activities.json?filing_uuid=5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd&issue_code=SCI", "selected": false}], "truncated": false}, "filing_year": {"name": "filing_year", "type": "column", "hideable": false, "toggle_url": "/lobbying/lobbying_activities.json?filing_uuid=5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd", "results": [{"value": 2009, "label": 2009, "count": 11, "toggle_url": "https://www.pawtectors.org/lobbying/lobbying_activities.json?filing_uuid=5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd&filing_year=2009", "selected": false}], "truncated": false}, "filing_period": {"name": "filing_period", "type": "column", "hideable": false, "toggle_url": "/lobbying/lobbying_activities.json?filing_uuid=5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd", "results": [{"value": "second_quarter", "label": "second_quarter", "count": 11, "toggle_url": "https://www.pawtectors.org/lobbying/lobbying_activities.json?filing_uuid=5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd&filing_period=second_quarter", "selected": false}], "truncated": false}}, "suggested_facets": [{"name": "received_date", "type": "date", "toggle_url": "https://www.pawtectors.org/lobbying/lobbying_activities.json?filing_uuid=5bb0f82e-e0d6-4ee1-98b2-a6b0f94e71fd&_facet_date=received_date"}], "next": null, "next_url": null, "private": false, "allow_execute_sql": true, "query_ms": 11.16801390890032, "source": "Federal Register API & Regulations.gov API", "source_url": "https://www.federalregister.gov/developers/api/v1", "license": "Public Domain (U.S. Government data)", "license_url": "https://www.regulations.gov/faq"}